By today I finished 10 PTs. ... was planning to do section by section drilling but after seeing ... thought I probably need to drill Flaw type questions from the Cambridge ...
Currently fool proofing 1-35 LG however I want to make sure my LR skills (or lack thereof) are not diminishing. I have saved some problem sets from the CC but after I finish these should I start from PT#1 and drillby question type or whole sections?
... thoughts on fool proofing LG bytype versus just going through the ... they recommend drilling by LG type (I guess to really drill the strategies ... for each type) So I am ... and cons of fool proofing bytype/not, and what method do ...
... about purchasing the LSAT questions by-type published by cambridge LSAT (one of ... of you could recommend some by-typedrill resources to me?
I ... hope all questions from the by-type drills are derived from PT ...
... (February) I drilled Logic Games bytype until I had a decent ... foundation of each type and then began drilling whole ... without wasting time on drilling bytype since part of the difficulty ... is identifying the type of game and drawing your ...
So if you drillby section, would you eventually be able to see the patterns in each question type? I keep jumping between the two ideas: drillbytype versus by section.
... of thumb is, don't drillbytype if you don't have ... game type in LG, then drill timed sections. If a certain type of ... question or game is giving you trouble, then by ... all means, drill that game or question-type.
... 1-35 and organizing them bytype yourself to make your own ... way imo. There are also drillbytype books that you can find ... + questions that you can organize bytype and difficulty.
@BinghamtonDave I wanna ask how could I prepare for LG section after finishing drillbytype. Is necessary to do unusual game or repeat the normal ones? thanks in advance.
Drilling by question type is helpful in the beginning ... the point where we practice by section (with all question ... ultimately tests us on. Drilling bytype is something we should do ... move away from drilling bytype. When we drillbytype our accuracy is likely ...
Just like with LR, it's okay to drillbytype in the beginning, but, as you progress, I think it's better to drill games as they appear on the actual test.
... LR, it's okay to drillbytype in the beginning, but, as ... think it's better to drill games as they appear on ... Cambridge Packets to learn and drill games (much like fool proofing ...
... LR, it's okay to drillbytype in the beginning, but, as ... think it's better to drill games as they appear on ... Cambridge Packets to learn and drill games (much like fool proofing ...
... LR, it's okay to drillbytype in the beginning, but, as ... think it's better to drill games as they appear on ... Cambridge Packets to learn and drill games (much like fool proofing ...
Yeah, some of those older tests can be hard to find. I think another option may be looking at Amazon for Powerscore or MLSAT's workbooks/drillbytype books. I think I had come across one that had games from PTs 1-40 or something along those lines.
There's actually a Powerscore drillbytype for 20-40 also. It's out of print but available used.
But for miscellaneous games, 1-20 is far more useful, since until around PT 16 or so, there's at least one miscellaneous game per PT.
... can check out the Powerscore DrillByType books.
> > & ... drill sets for every LR question type. You also get drills grouped by ... bank which you can group by PT, type, and difficultly. In short ... LSAT question to potentially drill if you so choose.