If someone could help me out on this one I am completely lost.
I know you can eliminate A and B and they both talk about what proportion of part time/full time employees quit before the policy was introduced and we only have information ...
Hey, guys. Why is there talk of three M here when the rules say exactly two M? JY mentions three M and others also mentioned in the comments section. What am I missing here? Three M was never an option for me becatse of that rule.
I have a real hard time seeing the correct answer on this one. The correct AC is (B). I chose (E). I really didn't like E, but AC (B) I only liked 1/2. The 2nd half of the answer, ..."to make up for the attendant loss is tax-revenues" threw me off. I ...
... LG and fool proofed games 52-80. I decided to stick ... and did no tests before PT52. I am not sure whether ... fool proofed the games from PT52 to 81. I did all ... I finished fool proofing tests 52 - 81, I did some games ...
Is there a way to make the analytics accurate (total percentage ) if you only do certain sections from a test . For example for pt52 I did 2 sections but it scored the ones I didn’t do as incorrect .
... . I scored a 177 on PT 44 after only a week ... games and another 177 on PT52 after a month of going ... score on PTs 44 and 52 especially after months of studying ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
Hi, I did some problem sets and this was one of the questions that I got wrong: PrepTest B - Section 1 - Question 14 (regarding the artists and subsidy)
Could anyone explain to me why the answer is C?? My weakness is pseudo assumption and I've read ...
I was watching the explanation for the in/out game referring to a group of people who can only be hired if they are interviewed for a position. In the explanation for the last question in the set, it mentions that the problem states at ...
Hi all - I'd really appreciate your help on understanding the argument in this question.
I get the gap in this question is that just because first doctrine states that "all historical events must be explained in economic factors" doesn't ...