I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
152 in March (though probably inflated since I guessed on most of the questions), average low 160's now, just got my highest of 169 on PT69. One thing I learned..I don't know how to read..
Today: PT 73
Wed: review + PT69 (+exp)
Thurs: review + PT 68 (+exp)
Friday: Review (reviewing stuff that I did poorly on)
Sat: Off
Sun: Review (only reviewing stuff that I did well on)
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
... , 2016 June LSAT BR Group PT 40
Tues Jan ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 74
Sat Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 49
Thurs Feb ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT 68
Sat Apr ... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT69
Thurs May 5, ...