Hey, guys! I'm having trouble understanding why B is incorrect. My reasoning for selecting B was that if the diseased male grouse were treated with antibiotics their sacs would show that they were infected and this strengthened the hypothesis because the ...
I just can't even understand what this question is saying, let alone understand the logic underneath it. Can someone shed some light as to what makes this stimulus so hard to understand?
If someone can really break this down that would be ...
I think this is the first question I've come across that I truly don't understand. I don't think I'm getting what the "obvious alternative" is. Not sending police officers? Dying here, plz help.
There is a myth out there that on Strengthen questions the LSAT will always give us four definitive non-strengtheners and only one strengthener. But this problem is arguably definitive proof that the myth is false.
**Admin edit: Please review our forum rules. Posting licensed LSAC materials is against the rule.**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/
I thought B was correct because the conclusion is that general ...
Having serious problems with figuring out this question. E is the right answer, but I chose B. My thinking for B is that it may have been a coincidence that all three times Monroe had eaten at Tip-Top, was already ill beforehand but ...
... last week to review a PT, and I think it's ... helpful. I will be taking PT73 and 74 this week, so ... an open invitation for either PT on Sunday (8/19)! Lmk ...
... March 10, 7-9pm EST, PT 67
Sunday, March 17 ... , 7-9pm EST, PT 69
Sunday, March 24 ... , March 31, 7-9pm EST, PT73
Sunday, April 7, ... 7-9pm EST, PT 75
Sunday, April ... 14, 7-9pm EST, PT 77
Sunday April 21 ...
Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only being one truly right answer because both A and B here seem to strengthen the stimulus-- A just ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
I'm a bit confused about the answer choice D. #help
**Premise 1**: Each of the EMP winners from the past 25 years covered by Acme retirement plan
**Intermediate Conclusion/Premise 2**: the Acme Plan offers the ...
I'm confused as to how this method can be used to compare chess-playing programs - to get the question right it seemed like you needed to know that you are only comparing one chess playing program to ...
... of this passage. Using PTs 73 and 74 as an example ... and the last passage of PT73, but had no clue what ... middle two passages; while for PT 74, I understood all four ...