I almost have LG down but I still have trouble with the questions that ask to substitute a rule for another rule to get the same results. Any general tips on approaching these kinds of questions?
JY makes copious reference to when rule becomes irrelevant in Logic Games. I have searched the core curriculum to review that lesson but haven't found it yet. Could someone tell me where that lesson can be found, please? Thank you.
... games concept of when a rule triggers/fails. I know in ... the lessons it says: rule only triggers when the sufficient ... negated. On the other hand, rule fails when the sufficient fails ...
... time you encounter a new rule, think about how it interacts ... :
-Sufficient failed, rule irrelevant.
-Necessary satisfied, rule irrelevant.
-Pare ...
how to indicate this logic "A and B cannot be selected together",
is it "A->/B" correct? or sth. else?
then it will be the same as "not both" rule?
really confused...