Jesus Christ, I am usually good at LG but the third game totally threw my off and I was literally blank for 3 mintues and had to jump to G4. Thank god there are only 5 questions!
This question really baffles me. How can B be correct? If the probe reveals that the light reflected is much less, how would that support B? Please help, I'm so confused!
So where is the key piece of evidence that I should really focus on in this question? The conditional is throwing me off.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-10/
Hello everyone I'm new here if there is anyone in the Atlanta area that would like to bounce ideas off each and self correct please let me know. . I'm better with another person???
Since many people have been clamoring for this I thought I'd start a new thread for the older and non-traditional future lawyers among us. Feel free to ask any questions you may have or share any stories or ideas you think ...
When an author starts off a RC passage with a Question is that generally a phenom begging 4 an explanation? or generally speaking what is the purpose of questions posed throughout an RC passage? thanks