- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
The word "suggested" means its not something explicitly stated in the passage or commonly thought from a surface level of thinking. D is correct because of what the question and passage imply overall to the problem that the critics and M face, which is a disagreement towards his work. Kind of have to use your imagination on this one.
I'm glad he gives us tricks like this because mapping out all of them would make it impossible to do it within the time period.
does anyone else have this problem where this question does not have the check mark on the bottom left to check your answers?
For these NA questions does the correct answer have to relate to the conclusion for it to be correct, just trying to have a process for choosing the right answer
I feel stuck, im continuously getting every question wrong over and over
for weaken the argument questions is it okay to go about these questions by trying to find an alternate hypothesis for why the stimulus says it is the way it is, and find the alternate one that is the most supported?
Im confused in the last one because in the previous recording he said we can choose what to slap negations on and I put it on the other one, than the one that he put in on in this video for number 5 is that still okay?
The reason why you can't have S -> P is because the only place that is sunny isn't Philadelphia. California could also be sunny if you write it as S -> P then ur saying if it is sunny then you are in Philadelphia which isn't exactly true or valid. But the question states and we know as a fact that if you are in Philadelphia it is sunny because sit says it is always sunny in Philadelphia, therefore P -> S. And based on this same question /S -> /P.
The order for strongest to weakest argument is the way it is because the Disney argument (1) is because it gives two explicit routes to how an ending could be accomplished, and it states that it didn't go down one of the routes, therefore it must be the other and this argument has a level of clarity that the other do not. If you think about it the levels of clarity and speculation can be inversely proportional. The mammal argument (2) is the next strongest because it gives a very general example of a tiger not being a suitable pet however a lion, or a gorilla is also not suitable again following the same logic there isn't as much clarity making it more vague in its own way. And finally the fat Cat argument is last because there is a high level of speculation that can't exactly be proved, however it may be very likely.
this is a wild question