I still don't understand why D is the wrong answer choice.

get the easier ones wrong, and the difficult ones right is crazy

ayyyyy lets go we got it right

this is a wild question

for weaken the argument questions is it okay to go about these questions by trying to find an alternate hypothesis for why the stimulus says it is the way it is, and find the alternate one that is the most supported?

does anyone else have this problem where this question does not have the check mark on the bottom left to check your answers?

when he said "who tf is Pat" I couldn't hold my laugh

yea MBT questions are just meh

The word "suggested" means its not something explicitly stated in the passage or commonly thought from a surface level of thinking. D is correct because of what the question and passage imply overall to the problem that the critics and M face, which is a disagreement towards his work. Kind of have to use your imagination on this one.

anyone gonna talk about how accurate the eagle was??

For these NA questions does the correct answer have to relate to the conclusion for it to be correct, just trying to have a process for choosing the right answer

Im confused in the last one because in the previous recording he said we can choose what to slap negations on and I put it on the other one, than the one that he put in on in this video for number 5 is that still okay?

ohhhhhhhhhh

I feel stuck, im continuously getting every question wrong over and over

this was the weirdest question I've ever seen.

The order for strongest to weakest argument is the way it is because the Disney argument (1) is because it gives two explicit routes to how an ending could be accomplished, and it states that it didn't go down one of the routes, therefore it must be the other and this argument has a level of clarity that the other do not. If you think about it the levels of clarity and speculation can be inversely proportional. The mammal argument (2) is the next strongest because it gives a very general example of a tiger not being a suitable pet however a lion, or a gorilla is also not suitable again following the same logic there isn't as much clarity making it more vague in its own way. And finally the fat Cat argument is last because there is a high level of speculation that can't exactly be proved, however it may be very likely.

LETS GOOOO

I swear I listen to him talk about the problem, and he runs through the steps and makes it so simple. In my head I say I got this then when an actual question comes, Im like what...?

I'm glad he gives us tricks like this because mapping out all of them would make it impossible to do it within the time period.

how can I tell the difference between surface level disagreement or a deeper disagreement, I know it is the wording in the question stem but what exactly should I be looking for?