- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
I hope I can start to develop better low-res summaries alone, cause man these questions have been toooo easy
fiddy five out of fiddy five
These explanations have GOT to stop making such drastic leaps without referencing why something is being done. For instance, the reframing bit at the beginning, along with "kicking the sufficient conditions into the premise set", felt so overwhelming to have thrown at you. Just feel like the last three explanations have done nothing to actually help me understand where I went wrong. Maybe I need to go over the grammar portion again, because I am not getting these SA questions at all.
THREE CURVEBALLS, Lord help me I can't do this
@breezyprabahar944 I feel like dying
WHY throw back to back curveballs as if I wasn't already struggling with this section
I chose C. I don't know why. I don't know how. I don't even remember reading this question. Now I watch an explanation to a question I was not even mentally present for. I travelled away from space and time, I entered a new realm, a new reality. My earthly body chose C while I was away. Was I abducted by aliens or do I have ADHD?
@Remember_Iryna_Zarutska Not everyone here is American first of all, nor is everyone here as smart as you my guy or gal
Had B chosen for a good minute, chose E because im no longer mentally stable
what the fuck man, how the fuck am i supposed to fucking know that about the fucking printing press. fuck the printing press. fuck the lsat.
cant lie, i almost obliterated my laptop screen cause of this one
@Jsonf of course! good luck bud :)
same scenario for me, good luck!
@Jsonf there's a small "show question" prompt at the top of the page bud
@cml343 i literally had the exact same thought process. But then again, the city I live in has a road named "Main Street". So I played myself
Pat... I trusted you
Shout out to J.Y for knowing what Assyrian's are, thats my people!
This was a great lesson, definitely helped clear up a bit of the confusion from the previous lesson
So essentially, we don't know what else life needs to evolve, we just know that liquid water is in the superset of what life needs to evolve? And we don't necessarily know that because liquid water (one of the necessary conditions for life to evolve) is present, life has evolved or will evolve? Is this framing correct?