This presumption of female pronouns is getting ridiculous. This tutor is four times more likely to refer to an anonymous author with "she" than "he". What the flip?
For (E), can we still identify "undermining" as the conclusion descriptor or at least partly? or would the piecemeal analysis be not much of help anyways? #help
#feedback i wish these later sections (argument part, MoR, etc) had similar formatting as the earlier sections, which have pages that break down common question stems and tips for tackling. these later question types are more mixed in and harder to parse
I feel like all the fake-outs of "pretending" an answer is correct and then revealing it's not is not the best method of teaching and much more confusing than this has to be.
So we heard assumptions aren't usually present in arguments when doing NA/SA. Is this just for assumptions from the author/speaker that are absent from the premises? Are assumptions from others/critics present in the context typically? #feedback #help
I thought based off a video in the lessons prior that "assumptions" are unstated claims in the stimulus, but JY clearly uses the term assumption is this video for something that is clearly stated by the critics #help
Typo in the reading "Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total inequality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold." It's supposed to be total equality. #feedback
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
40 comments
This presumption of female pronouns is getting ridiculous. This tutor is four times more likely to refer to an anonymous author with "she" than "he". What the flip?
For (E), can we still identify "undermining" as the conclusion descriptor or at least partly? or would the piecemeal analysis be not much of help anyways? #help
anyone else struggling on these? the language of the answers are confusing me since i dont even understand what half the answers are saying
if i got this as my third question on the test, im just hitting end and submit....
I now accept the fact that I am going to get all of these wrong on the test.
Had to watch this 2 times because I’m hella tired after 2 back to back work trips lol. Solidarity to everyone working full time and studying
#feedback i wish these later sections (argument part, MoR, etc) had similar formatting as the earlier sections, which have pages that break down common question stems and tips for tackling. these later question types are more mixed in and harder to parse
I feel like all the fake-outs of "pretending" an answer is correct and then revealing it's not is not the best method of teaching and much more confusing than this has to be.
So we heard assumptions aren't usually present in arguments when doing NA/SA. Is this just for assumptions from the author/speaker that are absent from the premises? Are assumptions from others/critics present in the context typically? #feedback #help
- i don't get any of this- someone dumb it down for me please
Is there a Strategy for knowing when to use the piecemeal strategy?
I thought based off a video in the lessons prior that "assumptions" are unstated claims in the stimulus, but JY clearly uses the term assumption is this video for something that is clearly stated by the critics #help
whoever wrote this question is a mean person.
I am confused on what the question is asking... "the political scientists argument proceeds by...". what does this mean?
Typo in the reading "Political scientist: Efforts to create a more egalitarian society are often wrongly criticized on the grounds that total inequality would necessarily force everyone into a common mold." It's supposed to be total equality. #feedback