Will the disagreements by each party always be made in their conclusions? or will some questions not have the disagreement/agreement in each of the conclusions?

I thought based off a video in the lessons prior that "assumptions" are unstated claims in the stimulus, but JY clearly uses the term assumption is this video for something that is clearly stated by the critics #help

I got the answer right and understood that the final sentence was the conclusion. Still, I spent time deliberating on whether the first sentence could have been a conclusion on its own rather than a general statement in my BR. Is there anything that separates the final sentence from the first making it not a general statement but a conclusion? #help.

Never mind, I think I got it. The first sentence in a way gives support to the last sentence where whereas the last sentence doesn't give support to the first sentence, making the last sentence the main conclusion as it only functions by receiving support, not giving it.

Is prescriptive claims usually always wrong in PSA, SA and NA questions? is there any type of question where a prescriptive claim would be correct? Perhaps in a principle question?

fell on my knees in joy and exuberance I finally broke my losing streak

Damn got this wrong simply cause I didn't know the full definition of "adversely". Drastically changes the meaning of A

I'm starting to understand SA slowly but surely. Basically, we are looking for a sufficient condition that helps the argument/claim in the conclusion occur. That's how i approached this question which led me to C. Its basically a form of a strengthening question?? #help #feedback

"Some produce grown in California is properly categorized as a fruit." instead of using the term "produce" what if the argument used "almonds" instead? Then would the argument become valid? #help

Great lesson

Would the contrapositive of the conditional laid out in the stimuli be correct ( If a company does not want to hurt its competitor, then it will accept its coupons) be correct? Even though the Checker's is not a part of this membership via the conclusion #help

I know the contrapositive is always logically correct but it seems in this type of question the contrapositive wouldn't apply to this stimuli's conclusion

Have strong supplemental essays/personal statements. A section on applications allows you to explain why some of your grades may be lower than other applicants. However, I think it's only best to do that section if you have legitimate reasons, so don't BS it. Good luck!

From my understanding, the inference is invalid because the statement "Therefore, if a student exhibits bravery, they will be sorted to Gryffindor." is a Mistaken reversal of the sufficient and necessary conditions displayed in the prior sentence/premise?

I've been doing these without all the diagramming and for the most part, have been getting the questions right within the target time. Is this viable long-term or will I eventually be dropping questions later on?

Basically, C is the contrapositive of the rule given in the stimulus ?

Would it be correct if B had an "All" instead of "many"? Including the quantifier "All" negates any possibility that the marketing campaign could succeed

Econ major coming in clutch

Nice little A-->B-->C chain in the first paragraph

#GimmeThat

Will we ever get questions where two answer choices are very close to the stimulus causing us to not only do the shallow dip but also diagram both to see which is correct?

Nevermind, I see its the case with A and D in this question

A 3.6 and a 167 can get you into a T20 school if you have strong essays, recommendations, and resume. If you have no motivation to retake the test, I would try your luck in applying. Best of luck, I hope to reach the spot you're currently at in the next few months