why arent the rules chained up?

like so: Comp. TOB RGBEL -> Justified -> Comp. TOB

I guess it would be pointless to arrive at the conclusion that the computer in typically used in operation of business (Comp. TOB)

@Oblivion push pull legs

I was bested by this duel but I shall prevail next time

@AliaAli yayy

@AliaAli brain broke -> time for break

hey there mister

you sir…are a fish

@josephlidd22 same, looking for strategies to not get caught up by the grammar

the competing hypotheses don't counter the correlation, they exist to compete as the explanation of the correlation

@NoaF123 you got this!

@petvma yes! try going back to diagram the spanish 101 question as well, it helped me!

who else went back to the spanish 101 question after this?

@DevanshiPatel thanks, now i can go to love island

@ckilk Great point on differentiating negation and contrapositive! But I thought negation was different from the opposite?

@JamesFoleno some dogs are not friendly, some dogs are not not friendly

@yesterdayseeker great job! brunson over wemby tho

@hjcraig you got this!

@ericktgon you got this!

@summeraaallen all is all to all

@GabrielLerma

Practice ("some" as excluding all)

• I could easily understand some, but not all, of the LSAT materials. (explicit)

• I can only understand some of the LSAT materials. (explicit)

• Although it's very challenging to completely master LSAT materials, I can easily understand some of them. (implicit)

@KennedyLuther you got this!

@CarolinaGuzman we got this! 1/3 as well

@DevanshiPatel good example!

2/5 but 5/5 on blind review

@petvma thanks!