made the same error! still got the question right but that was what was missing in my diagram, had to go with D as the AC with the least assumptions

Period! Also love me some RAYE to tackle a marthon or the LSAT.

these were rough

this, damn thing almost need a lawgic formula all on its own.

So very proud of getting this right :)

oh i ate this up

@sapalmeri I make sure I write down the "Lets's Review" section and force myself to draw the diagrams in my notebook for repitition sake.

@jzimo02 I believe that is why the word "indirectly" was added to the lesson.

@emilyclangie Uhmmm can we play this song with a beat?

@heyychrissaaay MEEEEEEEEEE

Time to spend 2 hours on this 20 minute video so exposure therapy will have me having this on lock till the concepts get more difficult 😍

First 5/5 w/o blind review in a while! The algorithm kept throwing things we hadn't covered in my study plan yet so it was rough for a while there.

12/12!

3/3 baby but wayyyyy over time

Wow this was a doozy

@TeklaCo this is so real lol, made this mistake on a lesson practice question and said never again lol So anytime i see the some arrow i now always automatically write it down flipped in my head. Just like how i thought myself to always right down contrapositives as well.

this was so satisfying to get right after all those mind boggling lessons

Hey! so #feedback, this graphic is a little misleading when it comes to the "some > few" section of the graphic. While I recognize that the graph was trying to show quanities / porportions from greatest to smallest. It accidentally implies that "some implies few", which is incorrect.

@niralidesai14270 This looks great but the only thing i would like to add is "MOST" is actually more than half, NOT at least half.

Like the video lesson's said, think of most as "Half + 1"

This would make the lower boundary of "Overwhelming Majority" at least more than 51%.

so

"overwhelming majority" means at minimum more than "most" (which is at least "half + 1")

"overwhelming majority" = higher than 52% (so around 55% and above) to 100%

YAS QUEENN

Oh I already know I am going to hate this

i got it right but the investment part of the prompt def had me overthinking lol, i had added it to my diagram and that is why getting the correct answer took a while.

@DominicStanley I believe the stimulus wants us to take "containing several different" authors as the editor having the CHOICE to include several different authors, not that it DOES contains several different authors.

I could also interpret the stimulus as saying while the editor is looking at the three named authors Lind, Knight & Jones, it does not mean they are not inlcuding other authors that are not those three.

I believe what the explanation means to imply was that , OUT OF THE THREE NAMED, there can only be 2 MAXIMUM from that list of three NAMED authors allowed in the textbook.

@StephenKim no the stimulus specifically says if Lind is included, Knight CANNOT be cause Knight tiggers Jones to be included as well and we CANNOT have all 3 in the textbook. This is why A is the correct answer.

3/3 :) Just took a while though!