- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Doing God’s Great Work
Admissions profile
Discussions
3/5 :( oof!
But I will say those questions very moderate difficult and above and we have not gone over those question types yet
Bet you I won't fall for that again.
Next time i will just follow the equation instead of my gut "Not more" = The Same or Less
Can someone please explain how
"People tend to be less objective regarding a subject about which they possess extensive knowledge than regarding a subject about which they do not possess extensive knowledge."
Means:
People are not objective about either subject (the subject they have extensive knowledge about vs. the subject they don't)
or
People are objective about both (the subject they have extensive knowledge about and the subject they don't)
Its not quiet making sense lol, did the author mix them up?
Doesn't the word "less" here imply we are comparing:
People being "slightly less" objective about the subject they are knowledgable vs. the subject they are not
or
People are "a lot less" objective about the subject they are knowledgable vs. the subject they are not.
5/5 baby! i took forever by i go it! and the first one was a level 4 question too damn lol
The brand Kirkland is an endemic speices to Costco. Good & Gather to Target and Great Value to Walmart. ifykyk
5/5 but there is a gap in how quickly I can accurately spot a predicator object.
Is it safe to define objects as what the subject is doing with the verb?
4/5, all level 3 and I only got the one i got incorrect because i second guessed myslef. AH!
Not to self: even short statements can be conclusions.
3/3 Whew!! finally being able to spot the subtle differences between a sub conclusion and a premise helped immensely!
Or at least knowing how to rule out the wrong answers faster if I am unsure.
Still need to get faster though!
While it seems small, being confident about the difference between a premise and a subconclusion is the difference between a right or wrong answer on the test
Okay I can't lie, I am stuggling of tease out the subtle differences between a premise and an intermediate conclusion. Cna someone help?
Note that on the LSAT is does not matter if you agree with the argument, you simply have to be able to identify what the author is putting foward as their premise and conclusion.
@H0928 Honestly this made me pause too, mostly because the first sentence felt like a filler to me, once I chose to disregard it and simply see it as descriptive, it made the argument a lot more clear.
5/5 baby! LR i'm coming for you!