This one felt easy to me, though I have struggled a lot more with lower-difficulty questions

The explanation was not helpful at all

Please add me! Thank you

This one was super easy for me. This is the best time I've ever gotten on a question (-00:21)

2/5, 3/5 after br. MSS questions are incredibly difficult for me

Was able to predict the answer before reading the ACs

I'm usually pretty good with conclusion questions, but this one is tricky!

I fully understood the stim and I got the question correct, however I found the explanation to be confusing and not really applicable given the time constraints of the LSAT. I think it would be really beneficial if you posted a video explaining your thought process of the question under standard time constraints, rather than posting a 8 minute in-depth explanation video

@kiarahemani I do this with every question regardless if I answer it correctly or not

This one was pretty straightforward. I ruled out E because it was obviously an exception to the rule, rather being the rule itself. B was the strongest answer choice. Time was +00:11

I'm not really a fan of the jokes in this lesson. I don't mind cursing when it's done well, however it just seems out of place and immature here. I would benefit more from seeing this theory applied to an actual LSAT question. That would really help me conceptualize this topic

@shahrukhChaudhry AC = Answer Choice

5/5, though I struggled more with q2 (1/5 difficulty) more than q5 (5/5).

3/3, but I was +1.11, +.028, +1.39. It takes too much time and effort to diagram, although I do feel as if the diagram drills are helping me piece together the argument and understand the sufficient conditions.

4/5. Got stuck on q4 because I misread the stimulus

@JohnCarey I would think that "filthy rich" is a member of rich. Filthy is just an adjective that gives us a clearer picture of how rich somebody is. Whether one is filthy rich, somewhat rich, very rich, or just rich- in my mind, they are all still rich to some extent. The negation to rich could be not rich, middle-class, etc.

@Dom80 This wouldn't be an example of an implied comparative because you use the word "than," making this an explicit comparative.