Self-paced
Would be cool to see how I compare against others in the new Logic Blitz game. Maybe it could display the top weekly/all time performers
EDobbs24
- Joined
- Apr 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Scored a 157 on the Aug25 LSAT. Have a stem bachelors/masters from WGU (no GPA). Applied in the 25-26 cycle and didn't get great results- will be R&R'ing
Admissions profile
LSAT
157
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2028
Discussions
EDobbs24
Sunday, Jun 7
@kju766 I think that reason you're looking for is that their company is having a hard time recruiting because of their high client loads. If you worked in customer service, would you rather work for a company that has high client loads, or a company that has small client loads? I got this question wrong (I chose D), but looking back I get it now
EDobbs24
Friday, Jun 5
#help I don't understand this at all. Can someone explain this to me in super simple terms?
EDobbs24
Friday, Jun 5
I read A and I immediately knew that it was the correct answer. Didn't even have to read the other ACs
EDobbs24
Wednesday, Jun 3
@Mace00 E is a very attractive answer, however where I believe is falls short is in its lack of addressing the other two numbers. The main conclusion in the stim starts with "This suggests...", and that talks about the positive correlation between the feeling of possessiveness in reaction to indications that another driver wants the space. If AC-E were true, then that would not explain why it takes more time for a driver to leave a parking space with a patient waiter, rather than no waiter at all. I hope that helps
EDobbs24
Wednesday, Jun 3
@TarikSoliman Not necessarily because maybe they are trying to be more cautious, which would require them to leave the parking space more slowly
EDobbs24
Wednesday, Jun 3
@Nwim I think the biggest indicator would be the stem. RRE questions will often ask you to resolve the apparent discrepancy. This means that the stimulus seemingly contradicts itself, and you have to select the correct AC which untangles the contradiction. With weaken questions, however, you are looking for an AC that disproves the conclusion. I hope that is helpful
EDobbs24
Monday, Jun 1
I was between A and E, but ultimately chose E because knowing the factors or not wouldn't change the amount of recording tornadoes. We could theoretically not know the cause of a tornado but still be aware of its occurrence. AC E understands this distinction. Since more citizens are helping detect tornadoes, more of them will be recorded. This especially makes sense if you consider more rural areas where meteorologists maybe don't have tornado detection equipment set up, but local residents live there and are able to pitch in.
EDobbs24
Monday, Jun 1
@Jaime.vel878 Yeah, some of these explanations are unnecessarily long and add to my confusion
EDobbs24
Sunday, May 31
@isabellagirjikian The argument is saying that a component is preferable to semiconductors only if all other features of said component are as good as the semiconductor, and if its heat tolerance is better than the semiconductor. Those two sufficient conditions must be true in order for the component to be preferable to semiconductors. In the case of vacuum tubes, they only meet one of those two conditions, being that they have a higher heat resistance. Because vacuum tubes do not meet both conditions, then they are not preferable to semiconductors, which is what AC-A says. I hope this helps!
EDobbs24
Sunday, May 31
Got my first level 4 MBF correct! I got the right answer, and when I did blind review I agreed with my original answer. (+00:49)
EDobbs24
Wednesday, May 27
This one felt easy to me, though I have struggled a lot more with lower-difficulty questions
EDobbs24
Tuesday, May 26
This one was super easy for me. This is the best time I've ever gotten on a question (-00:21)
EDobbs24
Wednesday, May 20
I'm usually pretty good with conclusion questions, but this one is tricky!
EDobbs24
Wednesday, May 20
I fully understood the stim and I got the question correct, however I found the explanation to be confusing and not really applicable given the time constraints of the LSAT. I think it would be really beneficial if you posted a video explaining your thought process of the question under standard time constraints, rather than posting a 8 minute in-depth explanation video
Omg yay I won! 7Sage is such an amazing platform