@long.john had the exact same problem lol

Finished. Every. Lesson.

Yeah I did not like this question. I read D and remembered that scientists were interested from discovering major craters on the moon and an "analysis of rock samples." I just do not understand how anyone just concludes that D is supported???

Jobs Not Finished.

I just totally misread the order of premise and conclusion and thought part to whole not whole to part. So I crossed out B and C instantly and selected between A, D, and E. Whoops :/

@LSAT1011 It also does not confuse necessary for sufficient. The argument is saying a sufficient conclusion. If you read labels, you have healthy behavior. If it was confusing necessary for sufficient, it would claim to have a healthy diet, it is NECESSARY to read nutrition labels.

@SarahHolmes754 same question

@DanielNahum It is because in E the instrument E only talks about relating to the hospital / public places. It is saying these public places can have 2 purposes but the reading is saying the public places has one purpose and the workers there (not the same "instrument," which by the way is a very vague description of public spaces compared to the other answers) have a different purpose.

Wow, speeding through this question worried about time I just totally missed the "citizens would like to see." Answer is fairly obvious after that.

Wow, I really understood this. The answer was so obvious to me with the exception of C, which I quickly realized did not strengthen the argument.

3/5 and 5/5 on BR. I swear once I get to BR and really try to read it again, my brain explodes like what was I thinking it was so obvious!

I can't believe I evaluated every answer exactly the same as the video :)

@aidamaeee04 same i'm worried I am becoming over confident lol

@ChadC thanks for making me laugh :)

3/3 lets gooo!!!!!!!!

@abahar12k I have the exact same thought. Not quite sure if its just a problem with the example or there is a clear reason I am wrong.

@naomiy2k To my understanding the kick it up method is not something you need to use when evaluating a conditional claim, but is an option that makes it easier. At the moment I generally have not been thinking about it in drills but I think I eventually will when I train harder levels.

@Lidiia took me about 2.5 weeks. Everyone goes at their own pace though. More important to retain the information rather than just complete it.

@AR91 Over the past several years, increases in worldwide grain production have virtually ceased. Further increases will be extremely difficult. Think about it this way. Why will further increases be extremely difficult? Because over the past several years, increases in worldwide grain production have virtually ceased. If it was simply context, you would not be able to find a "because."

I got 3/3, didn't find the questions to hard and I generally realize that the key to understanding the answer is to trust yourself to correctly outline what is context, premise, conclusion etc...