@jwn1060 Yeah this makes a lot of sense. I had the same problem as OP. Thanks for the explanation

@breezyprabahar944 Not exactly. D is correct because although the Cup is the earliest known instance of an alcoholic beverage does not mean that it IS the earliest. What we know and what is true can be incorrect. For all we know, maybe there is another cup somewhere we haven't discovered that really shows alcoholic beverages were produced 3000 B.C.

Ya know, although this question was not hard due to POE, answer choice A is not a great answer. When initially reading the stimulus and AC A, I believed that every time someone loses weight, their cells will dump cholesterol, rather than only one time. In the stimulus it says "when a person loses weight, their fat cells decrease leading to more cholesterol." When first reading this, I thought it implied that this happened every time someone lost weight, otherwise they would have written when a person BEGINS to lose weight. Still got the question correct and realized this mistake after a 2nd pass of the stimulus, but it is another odd example of LSAT trickery.

@zakariaJannane What in the argument points out that they had a small sample size? If anything, "various manufacturing locations" points to a reasonable size.

@KSki I had the exact same criticisms.

@fsantos60321314 Yup! I totally overlooked the suggested part and then crossed E out when answering the question. In BR i caught my mistake. I have to read more cautiously.

@BrooklynHope I also thought it was referencing the current regulations not the proposed. I still do not know how the question is implied for the proposed regulations.

@long.john had the exact same problem lol

Finished. Every. Lesson.

Yeah I did not like this question. I read D and remembered that scientists were interested from discovering major craters on the moon and an "analysis of rock samples." I just do not understand how anyone just concludes that D is supported???

Jobs Not Finished.

I just totally misread the order of premise and conclusion and thought part to whole not whole to part. So I crossed out B and C instantly and selected between A, D, and E. Whoops :/

@LSAT1011 It also does not confuse necessary for sufficient. The argument is saying a sufficient conclusion. If you read labels, you have healthy behavior. If it was confusing necessary for sufficient, it would claim to have a healthy diet, it is NECESSARY to read nutrition labels.

@SarahHolmes754 same question

@DanielNahum It is because in E the instrument E only talks about relating to the hospital / public places. It is saying these public places can have 2 purposes but the reading is saying the public places has one purpose and the workers there (not the same "instrument," which by the way is a very vague description of public spaces compared to the other answers) have a different purpose.

Wow, speeding through this question worried about time I just totally missed the "citizens would like to see." Answer is fairly obvious after that.

Wow, I really understood this. The answer was so obvious to me with the exception of C, which I quickly realized did not strengthen the argument.

3/5 and 5/5 on BR. I swear once I get to BR and really try to read it again, my brain explodes like what was I thinking it was so obvious!

I can't believe I evaluated every answer exactly the same as the video :)

@aidamaeee04 same i'm worried I am becoming over confident lol

@ChadC thanks for making me laugh :)

3/3 lets gooo!!!!!!!!

@abahar12k I have the exact same thought. Not quite sure if its just a problem with the example or there is a clear reason I am wrong.

@naomiy2k To my understanding the kick it up method is not something you need to use when evaluating a conditional claim, but is an option that makes it easier. At the moment I generally have not been thinking about it in drills but I think I eventually will when I train harder levels.

@Lidiia took me about 2.5 weeks. Everyone goes at their own pace though. More important to retain the information rather than just complete it.