User Avatar
JohnLeary
Joined
May 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
JohnLeary
Tuesday, Jul 7

3/3 馃

3
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Monday, Jul 6

Oftentimes, I do one of these questions, and I get it wrong, but I then do the blind review and get it right 馃槶 I need to be quicker and less hesitant when I'm answering these

3
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Sunday, Jun 28

I got a 4/5 on the first attempt, then got a 2/5 on the blind review because I second-guessed my answers, but one of the two questions I got right on the blind review was the one I got incorrect the first time 馃槶

1
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Saturday, Jun 27

4/5 on my first attempt, #4 is really tripping me up

2
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Thursday, Jun 18

For the Q5 referential "those", why is it just "novels" rather than "successful novels?" Is it just that the detail of successful is an unnecessary modifier that doesn't need to be pointed out?

2
PrepTests
PT130.S1.Q9
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Tuesday, Jun 16

@rjon27 I did the same thing -- I think I keep having trouble with the questions that focus on an argument's vulnerability to criticism, because I keep thinking that the answer has to be irrelevant, but COULD be relevant (even though it isn't). Reviewing the explanation helped me understand that I need to look at these questions differently than how I have been looking at them recently.

1
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Wednesday, Jun 10

@SamuelForeman Only Claim 3 would be considered a major premise, since it was previously the main conclusion until Claims 4 and 5 were introduced. Claim 4 would only be considered a premise since it supports Claim 5 but cannot be supported by other previously made claims.

1
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Wednesday, Jun 10

got a 0/5 on the first attempt, but then did the blind review and got a 4/5 馃槶

2
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Tuesday, Jun 9

@LSATspecialist I got confused on this question as well for this reason, but the way that I've looked at it is that the "If such a business introduced minor variation..." and the "Furthermore, variations in operating systems software can..." are secondary conclusions that are expanding on the main conclusion of "Therefore, it is advisable for businesses to implement such variations." <- this may be the wrong way to go about this, but dividing it up like this helped me better understand the problem

1
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Wednesday, May 27

@KamariDraine Hey, I'm also aiming to take it in October, would love to be apart of your study group

3
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Tuesday, May 26

@claytor Hey, I鈥檇 be down to create a study group. Lmk what times work best for you to talk and create a group 馃檹

1
User Avatar
JohnLeary
Edited Monday, May 25

Hey, I'm a student from UF and would love to connect with anyone looking to study for the LSAT! I am aiming to take the LSAT in October :)

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?