User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
148
CAS GPA
3.3
1L START YEAR
2026

Applications

Rutgers
Applied
Seton Hall
Applied

Discussions

Lessons · The Value Judgment Tag
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
4 days ago

Are all these "LR logic tags" a type of flaw? Like would they show up only in flaw questions or can they also show up in others?

1
Lessons · You Try - Dramatic Findings in Small Studies
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Apr 9

@EmmyIsabela THANK YOU! this makes so much sense

1
Lessons · [OPTIONAL] Lesson 11 - Vegetarianism and Nutrition
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Wednesday, Apr 8

@JessM takes for granted = assumed

2
Lessons · You Try - Dramatic Findings in Small Studies
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Tuesday, Apr 7

#help

I thought that D was already mentioned in the stimulus stating that small observational studies are more frequent than large randomized trials? Since it was mentioned, wouldn't that mean that it wasn't overlooked?

2
Lessons · Lesson 4 - Drink Milk to Lower Blood Pressure
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Tuesday, Mar 24

anyone else think this felt like a necessary assumption question?

1
Lessons · Negating Conditional Statements
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Tuesday, Mar 17

@Stannis Ah I get it! thanksss

1
Lessons · You Try - Chirality of Weedkiller Molecule (S)
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Friday, Mar 13

yayyy got this with 27 seconds left to spare. These WSE questions are hurting my brain lol

2
Lessons · You Try - Athenian Epidemic (W)
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Mar 12

For those struggling, remember that "not all" means "some", and some could just be 2 people which doesn't weaken this argument.

5
Lessons · You Try - Theory of Ecosystems (W)
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Wednesday, Mar 11

So I chose B because it goes against the bottom up theory in the sense that the availability of edible plants is not what determines the ecosystem's characteristics. For B, hunting is what caused the herbivores to increase/plants to decrease. Is this a correct approach??

2
Lessons · You Try - Automobile Thefts
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Sunday, Mar 8

@ValeriaFranco lol same. I had to imagine that before there used to be, let's say, 10 thieves and they all abandoned the cars, hence they never got caught. But now, let's say, there are 5 thieves and none of them abandon the cars.

2
Lessons · You Try - Vacuum Tubes
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Saturday, Mar 7

I've come to realize that for most must be true statements, the answers will be weak. For instance, answer choices B-E have phrases such as "will be, the only reason, will always, the only advantage". Those phrases are too strong.

16
Lessons · You Try - Raspberry Nurseries - MSS Review
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Saturday, Mar 7

Could we say LN --m--> primarily commercial AND guarantee? or does it need to be separate?

4
User Avatar
•

Saturday, Mar 7

KhushyMandania

Don't skip the foundations!!

Hello everyone! I just wanted to share how important the foundations unit is. When I first started studying about a year(ish) ago, I looked over the foundations unit thinking how it all was just common sense. The conditional logic section seemed so unimportant and even the grammar unit felt pointless. So... I skipped it. BUT, I can guarantee you that it's not pointless. Ever since I really dived into the foundations unit and started taking it seriously, I'm getting way more questions right. I'm getting the questions right which I used to get wrong all the time!!!

I guess this is all just to say that don't skip the foundations.

I know it might seem like a waste of time and we feel like our time would be better spent learning the question types, but everything which is in the foundations unit builds up to what we need in order to succeed in the LR and RC sections. So pleaseee, don't skip this and don't make the same mistake I did.

8
Lessons · You Try - Coffeehouses and Restaurants
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Friday, Mar 6

omg I did this question a while ago (like last year) and remember getting it wrong and never understanding it. I'm so happy I got this right with 2 seconds to spare lol

4
Lessons · You Try - Profits of Downtown Businesses
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Friday, Mar 6

@MarieChavis It's "negate sufficient". We take one part, negate it, and put it in the sufficient condition. The second will be in the necessary condition, but don't negate this part, leave it as it is.

So, I'm gonna negate the first part and the translation becomes "Profits will not increase" = profits will increase

Profits will increase --> congestion decreased

Hope this helps!

1
Lessons · You Try - Krakkenbak Bridge
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Friday, Mar 6

24 seconds left to spare woo hoo!!

1
Lessons · You Try - Teaching Chess
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Mar 5

Is A wrong because Skylar doesn't really talk about mental maturity? Skylar just talks about mental activity which is different from mental maturity, right?

3
Lessons · Lesson 1 - Engine Noise and Killer Whales
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Wednesday, Mar 4

@Carolinehink1 This is a level one difficulty. If you click on "show question" on top (near the comments tab) and then go to analytics, it will show you. I'm using a mac and that's how it shows up for me. Hope this helps!

6
Lessons · Causal Language
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Monday, Mar 2

Are the words "tend to" and "likely" correlation words? In other words, do they imply correlation rather than causation?

5
Lessons · Causal Mechanism
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Sunday, Mar 1

@Liliana_Levy this is super helpful

2
Lessons · Drill - Intersecting Sets
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Saturday, Feb 28

used to get conditional questions wrong all the time, but these lessons have helped so much!! Wish I didn't ignore them the first time around

5
Lessons · You Try - The Spring Cleanup
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Saturday, Feb 28

@EmilyEckenroth right!! I can literally feel the hard work paying off from those skill builders

5
Lessons · Negating Conditional Statements
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Feb 26

@DouglasNeumeyer Thanks so much for the clarification. It was super helpful!!

2
Lessons · Negating Conditional Statements
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Feb 26

I can't seem to understand the difference between negating "all" statements and negating conditional statements. Isn't All A are B (A->B) logically equivalent to If A then B (A-> B)?

3
Lessons · Negating “All” Statements
User Avatar
KhushyMandania
Thursday, Feb 26

Where would we use this idea of negating "all"? Like what question type on the lsat?

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?