- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
For question 2, why is the whole conditional a conclusion and not just: "the rate of interest can be reduced by an equal amount without there being a change in the true rate of earnings"
Are all these "LR logic tags" a type of flaw? Like would they show up only in flaw questions or can they also show up in others?
#help
I thought that D was already mentioned in the stimulus stating that small observational studies are more frequent than large randomized trials? Since it was mentioned, wouldn't that mean that it wasn't overlooked?
yayyy got this with 27 seconds left to spare. These WSE questions are hurting my brain lol
For those struggling, remember that "not all" means "some", and some could just be 2 people which doesn't weaken this argument.
So I chose B because it goes against the bottom up theory in the sense that the availability of edible plants is not what determines the ecosystem's characteristics. For B, hunting is what caused the herbivores to increase/plants to decrease. Is this a correct approach??
@ValeriaFranco lol same. I had to imagine that before there used to be, let's say, 10 thieves and they all abandoned the cars, hence they never got caught. But now, let's say, there are 5 thieves and none of them abandon the cars.
I've come to realize that for most must be true statements, the answers will be weak. For instance, answer choices B-E have phrases such as "will be, the only reason, will always, the only advantage". Those phrases are too strong.
Could we say LN --m--> primarily commercial AND guarantee? or does it need to be separate?
Hello everyone! I just wanted to share how important the foundations unit is. When I first started studying about a year(ish) ago, I looked over the foundations unit thinking how it all was just common sense. The conditional logic section seemed so unimportant and even the grammar unit felt pointless. So... I skipped it. BUT, I can guarantee you that it's not pointless. Ever since I really dived into the foundations unit and started taking it seriously, I'm getting way more questions right. I'm getting the questions right which I used to get wrong all the time!!!
I guess this is all just to say that don't skip the foundations.
I know it might seem like a waste of time and we feel like our time would be better spent learning the question types, but everything which is in the foundations unit builds up to what we need in order to succeed in the LR and RC sections. So pleaseee, don't skip this and don't make the same mistake I did.
omg I did this question a while ago (like last year) and remember getting it wrong and never understanding it. I'm so happy I got this right with 2 seconds to spare lol
@MarieChavis It's "negate sufficient". We take one part, negate it, and put it in the sufficient condition. The second will be in the necessary condition, but don't negate this part, leave it as it is.
So, I'm gonna negate the first part and the translation becomes "Profits will not increase" = profits will increase
Profits will increase --> congestion decreased
Hope this helps!
Is A wrong because Skylar doesn't really talk about mental maturity? Skylar just talks about mental activity which is different from mental maturity, right?
@Carolinehink1 This is a level one difficulty. If you click on "show question" on top (near the comments tab) and then go to analytics, it will show you. I'm using a mac and that's how it shows up for me. Hope this helps!
Are the words "tend to" and "likely" correlation words? In other words, do they imply correlation rather than causation?
used to get conditional questions wrong all the time, but these lessons have helped so much!! Wish I didn't ignore them the first time around
@EmilyEckenroth right!! I can literally feel the hard work paying off from those skill builders
@GabrielSiracusano got it, thanks!