I was soo lost; I had to reread this twice to understand. An example in this section would indeed be helpful, please.

Before I could confidently say I understood the correct conclusions for this skill builder, I had to leave this section for like 4 days and review all the notes I took for the intersecting sets section again today. Sometimes its okay to take a lil break, cause I was soo lost 4 days ago🥲

I got the right answer, but it took me 11 minutes, and now I have a migraine. I'm glad I'm not the only one who took their time cause I felt like I was glitching while reading the stimulus omg.

Guys Guys Guys, I got 5/5？？？ 👁️👄👁️Bro I've been struggling with PSAr questions all day yesterday, but I got everything straight today? Let's keep going guys🥲

I oddly find PSAa question stems wayyy easier that PSAr. The PSAr subset literally made my head hurt.

Finally ohh

#help sighh... Guys I'm really struggling with PSAr question types. I understand the "rule and applications" thing, and I know the 4 levels of indicators for necessary and sufficient indicators, however I am not quite sure I grasp how I am supposed to approach PSAr question types. I end up with two options left and always pick the wrong one. Ik we should be looking for a rule where the premises in the stimulus triggers it, but I keep getting it wrong. Maybe I'm not approaching them properly? Idk, I'm soo confused and frustrated, please SOMEBODY lmk if I'm missing something, or a way to approach these questions.

#feedback #help

I find question 6 a bit tricky. I believed that on the LSAT we weren't supposed to make assumptions but instead, analyze the argument based on the facts stated alone. question 6 is an invalid argument because there's uncertainty; so, are we to make assumptions based on inconclusive premises such as the scientific technique being unknown? I saw this fact as a fallacy (a red herring probably) because it does not tell us specifically that "if it is unknown then it is not peer-reviewed".

wow, first try with this and I only got two wrong! With practice, I know I can master this. JY was right, this kinda is faster when eliminating answers. I'm a slow reader, and I tend to forget easily under pressure, so this with the low res sum, helps ALOT.

yuhhhh I finally got a five-star NA question, after crying and losing my edges a couple of sections ago. What's helping now is that I usually get down to two answers, so I just pick the one that wrecks the argument when negated. I don't even try to make sense of it cause it legit does not make plain sense to me at all, but I just use the negation tactic and it works.

#Help, what should we be paying attention to for NA? The premises, right? What is our method of reasoning, or better yet what exactly am I even looking for in a stimulus like this that doesn't make the requirement obvious? I got the earlier parts of NA, but I've struggled with the last 2. HELP