But using that method Xavier would also agree with B.

I think the build up and the unknowns were the biggest factor and now that that is behind us we will be able to forge ahead! You got this!

Same, had a full blown anxiety/panic attack and completely bombed the first half.

You are correct, the answer is wrong. The first thing is laptops and the second the higher pay, which is the flawed correlation. If it said one thing causing another thing it would be correct.

This answer is wrong. It says the evidence is consistent with the first causing the second. The first is the laptops and the second the high pay, which is what they are falsely concluding, The order is backwards.

@Kevin_Lin Thanks Kevin! Although, asking type A future lawyers to leave tasks incomplete is a big ask...

@EdithM But then the days aren't complete!

@ScarlettKr but then your schedule is all out of whack!?!

For me the interface at the testing center was essentially identical to when I change the font size to large on 7sage. To me, the font on 7sage is tiny and I have to change it to large. I was pleasantly surprised that I did not have to do this on test day. But yes, it is definitely wider at the testing center, filling the full width of a standard computer monitor screen. I don't know if that is helpful LOL.

@SarahR64 havent scores already been released?

I liked the logic on B but I rejected it because the stimulus used absolute terms "every" and "no" whereas B was all "relatively" and "in general" so I just couldn't pick it even though none of the other answers had the correct logic, so I just assumed I misunderstood something and picked A. Kind of annoying how sometimes this would make the answer wrong, but sometimes it doesn't.

This is the second NA question in this section where the correct answer had nothing to do with the new information mentioned in the final sentence.

I thought all assumption questions involved the new information introduced in the end of the passage. In this case it was "hunter gatherers". Therefore I only looked for an answer choice that included that aspect, linking the domestication of the bovines being required for the end of the hunter gatherer aspect, that is why I chose B. I really did not like the part that said "one of the first" but this was the only one that linked the things I was looking for. Not sure how to avoid this in the future.

@NicholasMcIvor A conspiracy theorist may surmise they are trying to introduce random difficulty to slow down the inevitable score inflation, but clearly they have some really good reasonable reason.

This is hilarious. I started at 156 and have taken 30 PTs. I am currently at 164 average. According to this I should be at 171. So take it with a grain of salt. FWIW I have two master's degrees with a 4.0 and a 3.9 so I don't think you could really chalk it up to me being "slow".

@ElijahWhite yeah cuz it doesnt exist anymore :)

@McSec Because of how unusual last cycle was I really wouldnt put too much stock in these changes. This now takes into account the last admission cycle which was historically difficult. People with 3.9's and 175+s were getting waitlisted. They are more or less just educated guesses at best anyways.

FWIW any predictor should be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. All of these data are backward looking, are now considering one of the hardest and most unusual admissions cycles in history.

Does this affect the scholarship predictor at all? Or are you going to update that as well?

@bilingualspeechpath107 Original poster

@Kade_Katrak 100% agree with all facets of this reply!

Hello, I would like to discuss tutoring from you, thanks!