- Joined
- Dec 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I changed my study plan to one hour a day, yet it always builds 2 hours worth of work. I have tried everything, deleting the plan, changing the hours, starting over, delete the block, create a new block, nothing works. It always gives me two hours of work. What am I doing wrong?
For me the interface at the testing center was essentially identical to when I change the font size to large on 7sage. To me, the font on 7sage is tiny and I have to change it to large. I was pleasantly surprised that I did not have to do this on test day. But yes, it is definitely wider at the testing center, filling the full width of a standard computer monitor screen. I don't know if that is helpful LOL.
I liked the logic on B but I rejected it because the stimulus used absolute terms "every" and "no" whereas B was all "relatively" and "in general" so I just couldn't pick it even though none of the other answers had the correct logic, so I just assumed I misunderstood something and picked A. Kind of annoying how sometimes this would make the answer wrong, but sometimes it doesn't.
This is the second NA question in this section where the correct answer had nothing to do with the new information mentioned in the final sentence.
I thought all assumption questions involved the new information introduced in the end of the passage. In this case it was "hunter gatherers". Therefore I only looked for an answer choice that included that aspect, linking the domestication of the bovines being required for the end of the hunter gatherer aspect, that is why I chose B. I really did not like the part that said "one of the first" but this was the only one that linked the things I was looking for. Not sure how to avoid this in the future.
@NicholasMcIvor A conspiracy theorist may surmise they are trying to introduce random difficulty to slow down the inevitable score inflation, but clearly they have some really good reasonable reason.
Every time I go to do a PT in Lawhub I find that the interface has changed and it is super annoying and throws me off when I start the PT. The most recent is that there is no full screen function anymore. WTF!? I know no one can do anything about it, I just needed to vent.
This is hilarious. I started at 156 and have taken 30 PTs. I am currently at 164 average. According to this I should be at 171. So take it with a grain of salt. FWIW I have two master's degrees with a 4.0 and a 3.9 so I don't think you could really chalk it up to me being "slow".
@McSec Because of how unusual last cycle was I really wouldnt put too much stock in these changes. This now takes into account the last admission cycle which was historically difficult. People with 3.9's and 175+s were getting waitlisted. They are more or less just educated guesses at best anyways.
FWIW any predictor should be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. All of these data are backward looking, are now considering one of the hardest and most unusual admissions cycles in history.
Does this affect the scholarship predictor at all? Or are you going to update that as well?
Any way to do this? There arent enough PTs for me to do one every week. I will run out. But I also dont want to leave the gap in my study plan because not seeing the 100% will keep me up at night.
I full on talk out loud to myself and was thinking maybe I should do the at home test so I can do that, I guess not!
@ReaganPressley using the notes feature. Probably easiest is while you are doing blind review: at the top right the little notes icon will let you add specific notes about each question. Then when you go back in analytics you can filter for questions with notes and review each one. Hope that helps!
Humbly, I think the first one is far more compelling. The fact that you are leaning away from it means it would be a really powerful (and unique to you) story that would clearly set you apart from other candidates.
@Kevin_Lin Thanks Kevin! Although, asking type A future lawyers to leave tasks incomplete is a big ask...