IYKYK....RIP Tim Curry

Author's Viewpoint:

Yooo! 00:54seconds thanks to the shallow dip.

I kinda wish all of these introductory lessons for a new question type were given the same consideration in regard to structure. Flaw got 3 videos before the first official question.

This was ridiculous. All hard difficulties. Not a single 1 or 2.

@TacoyaWilliams I literally came from that video an hour ago.

Came back from future lessons to review this.

For you all watching this the first time around, please do not gloss over this. These are important. In future lessons, you'll run into question types, such as Method of Reasoning, Argument Part, and Main Point that will have answers dependent on whether you can distinguish which statements in a stimulus are premises and conclusions. Seems easy now but it can get challenging. Happy Studying!

So, after a quick google search, "does not obtain" means failing to acquire something or, in formal, legal, and philosophical contexts, failing to be true, valid, or in effect.

Just put this here since we may see this in our future, legally speaking of course 😊

Got my first NA level 5 question right but got lesser difficulty questions wrong.

All I could think about was the movie Medicine Man when thinking about this question and how Sean Connery's face would probably look at me in disappointment if I got it wrong lol.

I can't be the only one who is frustrated that these sections throw us into level 5 difficulty questions so soon. It doesn't feel like a gradual progression. For those of us who get the harder ones wrong back-to-back, this doesn't inspire confidence.

Well that brought my accuracy down to hell. 1/5 and then 4/5 on the BR. fml

Choosing AC: A ---> 😊

Wow, the one time I actually try to spell this out with "lawgic" and he doesn't even do it, but when there are easier questions that don't need it, he's quick to map it out.

The one question I do get right after those 2 hard ones and it's not even a "You Try."

There's a special place in hell for the authors of these questions.

17 min on a level 2 question is insane.

Bruh, even LSAT raspberries are diseased.

FOH with this question.

Well this is right on time. Definitely needed to find a way to bone up on my W and S questions.

@MJimenez7094 honestly, there was too much back and forth between strengthen and weaken that messed me up. I know they’re related but they should’ve been 2 separate lessons with their own examples before bringing them together.

Got it right but when he was explaining D, he made it seem like it was wrong just by his tone. Got me stressssssed out.

@MarieChavis same! Those pesky 22 seconds.

@marymoussa67424 thank you! I even got 3/3 😁

3 years this has been up and still no video? Way to listen to your users.

@Bkk374 4min 42 seconds for me lol