4/5 but its starting to make so much sense

4/5 i thought the last one had a sub-conclusion [Business has an interest in enabling employees to care for children]

5/5 this is getting simpler! ugh thanks 7sage!

5/5 :)))))

@yesterdayseeker LOL

@TobiStein this is sooo good! BUT, since you used the indicators so and after all would it not be less time consuming to identify those in complex questions?

Wait so I understand that subjective assumptions like the suitability of a tiger as a pet weaken the strength of an argument. BUT I don't understand where the assumptions are coming from in the third argument. Like, do we just assume anything on the spot? Do we come up with things that could weaken the argument in weaken questions and things that strengthen it in strength questions?