this one got me, the question wording bit me in the ass

@Deybomb17 damn! i was 38 under

for yall tripping about time: its practice rn. build confidence. one layer at a time, timing isnt valuable rn: the concept is!

had it right then switched my answer last second. oh my FUCKING GOD

what was this question dawg

my worst enemy is reading the answer choices incorrectly.

@Saul McGill i dont personally like the negate suggestion. it makes me more confused. the thing thats been helping me is asking "is this really necessary"

this is a nice little redemption from the previous section. honestly the tip of asking whether or not it is necessary has really helped.

first one i got right in here

this section will be the death of me im about to crashout

this question lowkey sucks

@gsigmon229816 same thats the only reason why i got the question wrong

@goldilocks deep breaths. I was really struggling with the weakener and strengthen questions. You got this, you are just as capable as everyone else is. You are smart. Take a step back,these drills are designed to be able to take slow. Dont worry about timing rn. u got this homie

@ejun0909427 bros the negative Nancy

for q3: would yall consider this to be correct?

new and 4+weeks </not available (/MN)

any new cats that are waiting for longer than 4 weeks will not be adopted, unless the cats are bonded

()= Mittness and Nittens

/= not bonded.

im confused on why q2 included new, and q3 didnt. To me this makes sense

@kpforpresident havent looked at the book yet but i believe so

this is the only exercise ive been stumped on so far. why is this incredibly frustrating?!?!?!?

@prestonbigley759 bro got a 180 on the lsat for sure

for q1: I got the subject and predicate correct, but I put deep wounds as an object, would that still be correct?

idk if this will help any of y'all but this is how I sorted it:

• The cat that I brought home from the shelter in the middle of the village where a merchant was murdered on the only snowy day last year likes to drink fermented milk from the Swedish cow that we imported from Austria at considerable expense.

  • Subject noun: the cat 

    • What about the cat: that i brought home 

      • Where did you bring the cat home from? The shelter

        • Where was the shelter? In the middle of the village 

          • What about the village: where a merchant was murdered 

          • When was the merchant murdered: on the only snowy day last year 

  • Preciate verb: drinks 

  • Object: milk 

    • What kind of milk: fermented milk 

      • Any fermented milk: from the swedish cow 

        • Any swedish cow?: that we imported from austria 

          • Was it cheap or expensive?: at a considerable expense 

• Kernel: the cat drinks milk.

is it me or is this challenging lmfao

im a little confused on why there is no object within this sentence. wouldn't the object be the healthcare reform bill? little lost.

• “Fat cats trained by parisian divas begrudgingly sing french lullabies from the belle epoque”

  • Subsets for the subject: fat and trained bt parisian divas

  • Subsets of the predicate: begrudgingly, french, from the belle epoque 

so far so good. keep it up everyone

5 tripped me up. I thought it had 2 conclusions. the first main one being the sustainable long term, and the sub being the last sentence.