Hi! I do the first 10 in 10 because with the more recent tests I have seen 4-5 star difficulty questions be mixed into questions 11-15, so I no longer found it worth the risk to do the first 15 in 15. I definitely still try to move through 11-15 quickly (not rushed, but yk what I mean); I would just argue that I am much more strict on the first 10 in 10 than I am on finishing questions 11-15 within that time frame. I also only drill curvebreakers for my smaller drills, so this has helped me move a bit faster towards the end of the section, which opens the door for more ample review of previous questions before submission.
Hey guys! I need some help! So, I've taken the LSAT in June and officially scored a 164, but on my PTs I averaged mid to high 160's. I have only ever broken 170 on a blind review PT (I got a 173). Other than that, I struggle to break out of the 160's. I am registered for the August LSAT; how do I break 170's by then?
From what I've grown to realize is you need to dose it. Start with untimed prep. Take full RC sections UNTIMED to train your mind to endure these word salads. That way, you adapt to the stress of back to back passages. Eventually, so much information in one section feels like second nature. At that point, add time back into the mix. Finally, remember: we all feel this way. Every single one of us has felt that the words turn into word salad. This test is painstaking, so take the time to pat yourself on the back for working so hard and being able to recognize your shortcomings. You're doing great!
Okay I am about to sound crazy... but my tactic to avoid burnout is every 5 questions, I look away from my test and close my eyes or look around and slowly count to 10. Ever since doing this, I have found myself avoid burnout and actually (surprisingly) move faster! Also, in terms of figuring out if it's the content or the timing, take an untimed full length PT over a few days. No fatigue or clock, just content. If you still make lots of mistakes, then you'll know it's content. If not, then it's timing and fatigue! All are easy things to fix! You've got this in the bag! I am rooting for you!
I honestly still am confused on why we chose C and not A. Can someone please explain?
From all the PTs I have taken, the last five are the hardest/curvebreakers! 7Sage has weekly lessons for that under live classes (if you have that subscription). If not, a fantastic substitute is the Loophole Logical Reasoning book. I used to have the same problem and Loophole is doing a wonderful job at helping me patch it up!
Think of it this way: for weakening questions, you're looking for the flaw hiding somewhere in the answer choices. For flaw questions, the flaw is already in the stimulus, you just need to be able to pick it out and restate what that flaw is in the answers!
Best advice I've ever received: if you can't disprove your existing answer, do NOT change it!
IS THIS WHAT LOVE FEELS LIKE
Apparently I don't so join the club dude
I got this question right, but I am still stuck on why B is wrong. I only chose A because I felt that the reasoning was better. Can someone explain why B is wrong in simpler terms, please?
Click the clock icon on the top of your screen and set it to target time! You might be on unlimited, which is why the target time only appears during BR
I used to have a similar problem and I was given this advice: do NOT move forward in reading if you did not understand the sentence you just read. I know that sounds like it will take a lot of time, but rereading the stimulus 15 times takes up even more time! If you still find yourself reading slowly, try reviewing the grammar lessons! They are so helpful in parsing through jargon. Good luck! Sorry I didn't mean to reply here, I meant to reply to the main comment :(
I just recently got to the 160s and want a study buddy around my score who can meet virtual once a week. We can teach each other and push each other to do well! (Eastern time zone)
I tried to skip around the syllabus and only messed myself up more. I saw my scores go down and started to get confused. Take it from me: follow the syllabus... it is set up the way it is for a reason!
Can someone explain this more please I'm confused as to why most before most works when split but not together :(
can someone explain 6 please
Can someone please break down why we can't chain #4? I still don't get it...
you're so not alone- me too! If you take a step back for a few hours and come back with a clear, mind that usually helps!
Can someone please dumb down the "avoid confusing sufficiency for necessity part", please?
I feel like the premise and conclusion for 5.2 make more sense being switched. Can someone please explain the logic behind this question?
That makes so much more sense, thank you!
I'm stuck on question 8.2. Does anybody have a different way to think about it?
@bastodurand134 (not sure how to use this reply feature lol) a curvebreaker is a 5/5 difficulty question. These difficult questions are often referred to as curvebreakers because they set the curve between 170+ scorers and others. In terms of your update, that is WONDERFUL! I am sure you'll find that the more you put the first 10 in 10 or 15 in 15 method into play, it will totally elevate your LR game. Best of luck!