wondering this as well

5/5!!

Thank you!

could someone explain #45?

I'm so confused

Is this PT64? Or Pt134? The search bar and the question say different things

This was one of the first topics talked about in this section! JY mentioned how experts on these topics wouldn't make assumptions because they look at it more as a cost-benefit analysis rather than just the benefit it initially states. Taking the first part as it as then reading the second portion of the stim helps you think about where the gap could be!

you're. Sorry

Completely missed that it said 'most.' UGH

I agree. It seems clear to me that you can say for a new department to be funded it must have 50 p/y and 25%. As will have 25%, and it is funded, so it must have 50 p/y as well. Felt like the explanation given in this video was muddled and added a lot of confusion that wasn't necessary.

Had B then changed to A

Personally I would recommend reading the entire stimulus. Just like how JY showed in the first question of this section, sometimes you think you've found the conclusion when you really haven't!

Agreed

Curious as well!

#feedback Agreed

Thank you! Super helpful

#9.

PREMISE 1:

W-M

/M-/W

PREMISE 2:

L-/M

M-/L

PREMISE 3:

H-L

/L-/H

W-M-/L-/H (Cannot happen because you know that Mr. White synthesizes LSD.

So, must be H-L-/M-/W.

Can say for sure that Mr. White is not making meth nor weed and that he is making LSD. Unsure if he is making heroin because LSD is required for heroin, but heroin is not required for LSD.

Wondering this as well

I'm so confused on #4. This is super disappointing because I felt like I understood everything until the chaining conditionals. It's hard to not feel frustrated

#help I was wondering this as well

.

For 6.1, why is the object "carbon dioxide" and not "amount"?

Thank you! Very helpful :)

Can someone explain the verbs of 3.1?