User Avatar
katieghart01
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
katieghart01
Saturday, May 31

I am so frustrated.. I've gotten so many in a row wrong. Why am I not learning from my mistakes!!!

User Avatar
katieghart01
Friday, May 30

#help - Where did I go wrong here. I now understand why C is correct (I originally misread it) but I'm still struggling to understand why E is wrong.

I interpreted the stimulus to be:

accurate + curious → Good Journalim

I kinda ignored the part about high viewership, maybe this is part of my error.

I interpreted E to be:

/(accurate or curious) -> /Good journalism

Using DeMorgan's law, I took the contrapositive of the OG stimulus to be the same thing that E was saying.

Did I incorrectly translate something into lawgic here? Or is the takeaway that if the actual argument is present as an AC, then that overrules the contrapositive of the original argument?

User Avatar
katieghart01
Thursday, May 29

So what should be my takeaway here if out of the past 4 practice questions, I've gotten three right only in the blind review portion? Should I focus less on speed and just read everything more carefully and not mind the clock?

User Avatar
katieghart01
Saturday, May 24

Can someone please help me understand: Identifying a causal factor doesn't preclude other causal factors.

Identifying a causal pathway doesn't preclude other causal pathways.

User Avatar
katieghart01
Saturday, May 24

Sometimes with a wordy stimulus like this, I find myself jumping to the last sentence and working backwards through the paragraph and that has seemed to help me dissect what is actually being said better. I am wondering if this strategy will ever come back to bite me?

User Avatar
katieghart01
Friday, May 23

I got this right but after staring at my screen like a zombie for 10 mins... ugh.. If this is level 4 difficulty, I am very scared to see a level 5...

User Avatar
katieghart01
Thursday, May 08

For me, depending on the statement, I find it easier not to think about which indicator word is being used, but instead I create the contrapositive statement and see if that makes sense.

For example, #3: lets say you flip the sufficient and necessary conditions on accident - highest flying bird → nests in the Andes, contrapositive being if does not nest in the andes → not the highest flying bird - I know this is incorrect because it assumes the highest flying bird ONLY nest in the Andes, which is not necessarily true based off the context given, so more logically it is nest in andes→highest flying bird

User Avatar
katieghart01
Thursday, Jun 05

i'm gonna go take a walk

Confirm action

Are you sure?