I choose answer choice D but then in the blind review I moved to B and I really debated Because the more I examined B, the more I thought that the original statement in D is she would run the marathon and the conclusion is connected to her winning the marathon not running so that tripped me up because I thought it would say it is probable that Lopez will not win the marathon. as that is the original statement they are looking at sometimes a second chance is a curse because your gut is better then you'd expect #feedback

is it reasonable to say most is used 3 times in the stimulus and the same with the answer ? so that can help it to be correct as it is the only one where its used 3 times

honestly idek what that means haha

i understand why this works because i had this in my diagram i kinda of took it a step further and said no good life with outlaw why is this wrong ?

#help Added by Admin

if I'm being honest don't even know what I was reading in the stimulus ...

wondering how i will do all this is like less then a minute lol

this was hard

I chose A but I was a tad unsure at first so I made sure to work through the blind review I didn't change my answer so I was really proud of the progress I made working through this Here's what I came up with in case it helps

Premise- actions cause damages

premise -she reasonably expects

Conclusion- she needs to pay

A- This seeks a conclusion but read other answers first

B- (struggled with this because the wording is so similar to A

knew that it was group two

PAY-----prior accident

/before accident ----/pay

condition prior is different than reasonably expected

C- okay ????

D-yes they do claim this but do not reach a complete conclusion missing

E- great but there is missing a end goal here what is triggered by this

are "only if " answers always to be thrown out

#help (Added by Admin)

i agree i saw this word and I was like idk if I pick this answer choice because i had no idea what that meant

i almost fell for a bc the first sentence is so tempting. just goes to show the importance of reading each answer choice all the way through

i choose b and then debating changing it to d in blind review I did not change it and I waa seriously humbled

i didnt pick e till blind review because I wasn't sure if it was to large of an inference

this kinda tripped me up

I got this correct but i spent a lot of time in blind review debating this because I let the wording of the question confuse me and I was looking for support I'm glad I didn't change my answer but I think its because I gave up and dint think any other answer was fitting

i switched my answer in the blind review from d to c because c specifies about other people and i got hung up on that

the way I broke it down was

I think that it is saying b COULD cause c because like jy expresses its not a guaranteed like there could be a demand yes but if they dont take action b would not guarantee an economic disaster because there was no action taken

the demand and the action are two separate things

I see why you are confused though because the wording here is tricky

if you said something like

loosing ones job is an effect of impersonal social forces leads to a high demand of govt control over the economy. although it wil provide protection over all it will lead to an economic disaster

here you would be able to say a could cause b and could cause c and so fourth

A- loosing ones job is an effect of impersonal social forces CAUSES B to a high demand of govt control over the economy. CAUSES D lead to an economic disaster

the way I broke it down was

I think that it is saying b COULD cause c because like jy expresses its not a guaranteed like there could be a demand yes but if they dont take action b would not guarantee an economic disaster because there was no action taken

the demand and the action are two separate things

I see why you are confused though because the wording here is tricky

if you said something like

loosing ones job is an effect of impersonal social forces leads to a high demand of govt control over the economy. although it wil provide protection over all it will lead to an economic disaster

here you would be able to say a could cause b and could cause c and so fourth

A- loosing ones job is an effect of impersonal social forces CAUSES B to a high demand of govt control over the economy. CAUSES D lead to an economic disaster

I think one thing I struggle with is when to stress timing rn I am trying to take my time and break it down like he does but im wondering to myself how will be be able to be so speedy on the test and properly break it down

under what context do you run an expriement It would be helpful to see this used in a question stem #help

so basically what we do is pick out a hypothesis

and then to determine how strong or weak it is we apply these 5 things and if they fail it is weak

but does a hypothesis have to pass all 5 of these or can it suffice with only one?

#help

so am I chaining this together properly

A the mining company's failure to properly line their dumping site. CAUSED B-- toxic chemicals to leach into the soil. CAUSED C toxic chemicals to leach into the soil. CAUSED D caused the dolphins to be poisoned.

and then we say that A caused D

so in the chain the how is basically the meet of the argument?

and the first and last can become linked ? #help

if we cannot identify a casual mechanism does that mean our original hypothesis is weak? #help

“target phenomenon” thing we want answer for

my shirt was white and now its purple

i spilled blueberrys then put stain remover then washed it where there was a chemcal reaction in the washer and it came out purple

blueberrys caused stain remover stain remover casued washing washing causes chemical reaction ,chemical reaction caused purple shirt