Are there times when causal logic would have a conditional claim in it? Or if I see causal logic I know there isn't any conditional. The "when" used in the stimulus confuses me a little bit and I wonder how I can know it is not conditional and just causal.

So D is incorrect because an attempt to synthesize water would not increase water quantity by much and therefore not make a sufficient increase in the amount of freshwater overall? Therefore it is ok if there is at least one attempt that increases the water quantity, because that does not mean that it does enough to effect the levels needed for all humankind.

In what kind of situation would I apply this? No LSAT question is going to tell me to negate the conditional relationship. Is this just to get mastery of the concept or does it apply to question types?

I understand all-> most-> some, but can most imply many? why or why not?

#help For answer choice C, wouldn't an alternate claim be that the club knows that another rental store is offering a deal and that is why they are not taking the deal today, wouldn't that resolve that idea? So if C says that it is not the case that there is another deal, it is also denying another competing hypothesis?

#help I am understanding and diagramming these questions correctly and can understand that the flaw is switching up sufficiency and necessity. But the way that the answers choices are worded when they are in the general format has been so confusing for me, any recommendations on how I can get a better grasp on understanding the wording for these?

I am mapping these all out correctly and I understand the prompts but I still choose the wrong answer. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to actually pick the right answer from the conditional statements that I create, I can see the logic but cant seem to translate to the answers

#help this does not make any sense to me. how does the production of paper in equal weight of plastic affect the actual use, shouldn't the correct answer tie something into use? is the production more harmful because once it is made people are using it more and therefore discarding it more? if people used plastic more the argument would be flipped so I don't understand how that gives good support. I don't see how D relates to use