The way that I saw it was that B kind of already goes along with the argument since it states there's still a chance to save the product, even though it's not guaranteed to win. So, B says many products fail, whether or not they use the campaign. Which the argument is already taking that into account in their conclusion. Not sure if this is a great explanation, but this is how I thought of it as I was eliminating the answer choices.

I personally don't because I can usually make the inference myself right after reading the stimulus.

5/5 on Medium and 4/5 on Hard

Love these questions. I've realized this question type is my strength, along with MSS.

I completely agree. I have an issue where I look at the stimulus blankly, so I have to write it in my own words to understand it, and then come up with my own answer before diving into the answer choices.

You got the question wrong so they put it as a high priority meaning to go and watch the explanation and try to figure out why you got it wrong.

Can someone explain the difference between B and D a little more? I feel like medicine part of the stimulus, saying that medicine has both beneficial and harmful effects. It made me think the same for the government.

This question is great to also mention how two answers may seem identical in a sense but there's always something about one of those answers that has less assumptions. With C we are talking about making better nutritional choices against sweet commercials on TV. With B we are talking about physical exercise and health with sweet commercials. Which would make the most sense to you. Of course it would be the nutritional choices against sweet commercials because we are talking about that same set (food).

I feel like I always forget a word in the actual stimulus that could change the entire answer choice.

The answer choices threw me off. I don't understand that language. 1/2

Could 11 also be some?

I'm having an issue where I'm chaining them how I feel (not the same as the answer) and still getting them right on the valid conclusions. Should I go back to learn exact chaining or move on? #HELP

With this question I was a little confused based on the fact that I felt as though they did not talk a lot about the artificial fibers in the stimulus but I realized that you have to infer for this question. Definitely understanding a bit more but at first I crossed all of them out and landed at E but didn't want to infer so I just picked C.