i just dont understand SA at all

this is so funny im losing it. thank you i needed this i was also a lazy c word (in case they suddenly start modding LOL)

so unethical

i would also like to know the answer to this question #help

i got this right, but im confused as to how the second half is the main conclusion and the top half is not......

i need to get a grip on knowing which sentence is the conclusion omfg

it's a premise and is an example, so it's just not talking about that. sorry idk how else to explain it but i hope that helps LOL

this got me ugh

this is great thanks so much!

i would just say "they're not affected the same way" which destroys the conclusion being that the best with the supervisor is also the best without the supervisor

this was so so so helpful! im so thankful that i ended up commenting about my concerns, so i could get such a thoughtful reply so soon. i will be taking all of this advice!

im so sick i am getting 4/5 of these wrong and most of the SA lessons wrong. i dont even know how to move on to the next topic when i so clearly do not understand this

omg thats so funny i didnt notice that

The Fox News dig was too good

I think it might have to do with the fact that political groups are effective when they are passing legislation. That is their entire goal!

isn't the answer just that you run an experiment when you want to test a hypothesis and come to a conclusion?

#help (Added by Admin)

i think (and im not 100% but from what i gather from this and previous education) is that causation is a subset of correlation. not all correlations are causations but all causations are correlations

good question i also want to know #help

#feedback#help

yeah, when will they be? #help #feedback

I'm going to assume that, similar to most (even though they are not exchangeable), it has to be "all" because there is no upper boundary given

i think r is not adopted because /q -> r??? im so confused #help

yeah im also confused #help