Does anyone have any insight on New England Law? I got an 85% scholarship which I was thrilled about, but the more I read into it it seems people are deeming it predatory. This is the first yes I have gotten, but any insight would really help. I feel like this big of a scholarship is too big to pass up.

Hi everyone! I’m Bryce, an attorney who, after passing 3 different bar exams in first sittings and practicing for 10 years, discovered that my real passion isn’t practicing law… it’s teaching the LSAT.

Why work with me?

Unlike tutors who rely solely on their test score, I bring something different to the table:

• 564 hours of LSAT tutoring experience (Through Wyzant under Bryce N.)

• 188 five‑star reviews (and zero below five stars)

• A decade of legal practice across three states

• A teaching style focused on clarity, confidence, and adaptability

My students consistently tell me the same thing: “You explain things in a way that finally makes the LSAT make sense.”

My LSAT story (and why it matters for you)

I scored a 168 on my first attempt after just a couple months of studying — no course, no tutor, and nothing but a book of practice tests and some second‑hand notes from a friend.

I learned the test the hard way, which means I know how to teach it the easy way.

If you’re in the 140s–160s and want someone who understands what it’s like to build LSAT skills from the ground up, I’m your guy.

What I offer

• Full LSAT curriculum or targeted help

• Individual question‑type breakdowns

• Timed section and PT analysis

• Reading Comprehension Focus

• Clear, simple explanations that build real understanding

• Support between sessions if you get stuck

Rate

• Standard: $60/hr

• Bulk:

  • 5 hours for $275

  • 10 hours for $500

  • 20 hours for $900

• Group Rates (50% added per additional student)

  • 2 students: $90/hr total

  • 3 students: $120/hr total

  • 4 students: $150/hr total

Free 15 minute consultation

Let’s talk about where you are, where you want to go, and how we can get you there.

Let me know below if you are interested or book a time for the free consultation: Calendly

Looking forward to helping you hit your target score!

- Bryce

Hi all!

I am going to be in China for a while and I am looking to start a virtual (open to in person if we are in the same area) study group to keep each other accountable. Studying LSAT can get really lonely sometimes and I would appreciate a community to cheer each other on during the process.

A little about me: I just graduated with an MA in Art History. I have taken the test in January and scored a 162. My goal is 170+ in the August LSAT and to apply early in the cycle. I am finishing up on the lessons and moving on to a combination of drill (2-3 hrs/day) and live lessons.

Send me a DM if you are interested or want to connect:)))) Thanks!

Hey there. I am going to be in Lagos for some time. I would most likely take the LSAT (Jan) here as well. I would love to have weekly study sessions with anyone here also studying for the exam.

With the June LSAT less than a month away, I would really like to be able to see my improvement by tag. I want to see if what I've been doing to target issues within specific tags as been working...

Hello! I'm a practicing attorney who has tutored the LSAT in some capacity for over 10 years, has specialized on it for 7 years, and has a long, verifiable track record of success on WyzAnt (profile "Shane G.") - in case that's helpful as a reference point.

I've been practicing law for about 1.5 years now (licensed in October 2024), and because I work solo on both the legal and LSAT tutoring fronts, I fortunately have a good amount of flexibility with respect to how I build out my days / devote my time. That's been a high priority of mine for years, and because of that, I can typically figure out a meeting setup that works for the vast majority of students who contact me (including some overseas students currently).

That said, because I run my own law firm and am an expecting father (May 11 due date!!), I'm looking to keep sessions (both 1-on-1 and group) consistent. My intention is to offer 2-6 group sessions (1.5 hrs each) throughout the week depending on interest/scheduling, with each session comprised of 3-9 students per session, though the exact composition may vary for each session.

If you are interested in working with me 1-on-1 or in a group setting, please reply below or message me, starting your reply/message with "1-on-1", "Group", or "Both", and of course feel free to elaborate from there.

Thanks for your time and best of luck using 7Sage! It's an excellent platform and has been my top recommendation to students for at least the last 6 years. Please be sure to use the customizable drill feature heavily once you've gone through the core curriculum - best way to break through plateaus in my experience!

Hello everyone!! I just did the second argumentative writing on Lawhub and I wanted to know your opinion about it. I have less than a month to improve so I would love to hear what you think about this response and is there anything I can do to improve it. Thank you so much in advance!!! I copied it exactly as it was at the end of 35 minutes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The parents' role in education should not exceed the role of other authorities, mainly the educators and teachers. One of the main reasons for this idea is that the authorities in that area, specifically the educators are the professionals in their field. They posses years of knowledge and experience that was earned through a long period of time teaching and analyzing the results from it. These knowledge and experience can be successfully put into practice while choosing and teaching children what they should and what they need to learn. 

Moreover, the decision of parents rests on the idea that parents already analyze and predict what their children will need and do in the future. Weaknesses in this idea are inevitable. First of all, parents' could impose their own desires and beliefs, even without realizing, into their child and one's future. On the other hand, educators equip all children with objective and broad knowledge, which is given through different subjects and their assessments. This way, one could get the basic knowledge and make a decision for themselves by analyzing what areas are in their interests and what they want to carry with themselves into the future. Another weakness in the parents' idea, which stems from the first one, is that children could not even know that their life is being influenced by their parents. This could lead to years of uncertainty in one's choice of major in the university or even one's career path. This decision should be done by children themselves and the best way they could do it is by being guided with objective and broad information acquired from their teachers. 

I certainly disagree with the perspective 1 in terms of it being rested on some assumptions. First, it assumes that the effects social media or any other negative influence on the life today will affect public schools adversely and strain the belief the parents have on school teaching methods. It assumes that parents' being able to choose for their children will counter those undesirable effects of modern harmful and inappropriate influence. This same idea also rests on the assumption that educators are not knowledgable enough to assess these same concerns. These teachers and educators, as mentioned in previous paragraph, are, first of all, in their respective fields because of their ability and their years of knowledge of teaching and education. If those educators were people who never dealt with such issues, then it might spark a debate whether they are capable enough of delivering the desired results and counter the undesirable influences. 

Another interesting idea is put forward in perspective 3 which I grant to be the example of my previous arguments about the capability of educators and teachers. The educator is capable enough to assess what is needed for child's future given the period of time they are in. The idea in this perspective about fundamental values is especially correct in that such values are fundamental for successful future of children. While parents a lot of time make assumptions or desires based on their subjective assessment or their life's period, educators such as in perspective 3 are wholly focused on objectivity and the requirements of their period of time.

Additionally, even the perspective 3 is partly supportive of my argument in terms that it indicates that parents' often judge by their own life experience and their period of living, although this argument fails to recognise that even if students are fully capable of being cautious and informed, nevertheless, the role of educators in this respect would enhance their understanding and knowledge. It could equip them with more ideas about the dangers of some content or even strengthen their own beliefs and knowledge by giving them concrete evidence. This would make them more confident in their abilities and in their actions as they move forward in life.

Despite my defense of the role of educators in the education of children, it is still correct that parents are very important in child's life, whether by guidance or giving them knowledge. We must admit that parents also possess years of experience and knowledge. But this knowledge, while being significant for child's future, might not be as precise and as professional enough as it is in educators or teachers methods of teaching. Thus, while admitting that parents should educate their children as much as they can, the ultimate requirements for future and child's knowledge is best decided by other authorities. 

I need help on Flaw Qs, specifically navigating the answer choices.

I'm getting better at finding the flaws in the argument. I have a prephrase or a rough idea of what the flaw could be. I'm trying not to be overly attached to the prephrase either, but even then I am often running into trouble.

It's the answer choices that give me such a hard problem.

In my current approach, I equip myself with different tests I run:

• Is it descriptively accurate?

• Is it the flaw?

• For takes for granted/assumes, MBT test

• For Overlooks possibility/fails to consider, Weaken test.

But, the way the answer choice is worded really tricks me up. I also try do piecemeal analysis, but that doesn't really help me decipher the answer choices.

Does anyone have any suggestions or tricks they do when going through flaw questions?

Hello all!

I want to start by saying I am exceptionally grateful for my April LSAT score. I took it for the first time, and got a 170. I am very happy that my hard work paid off, and am thrilled that I will be able to go to law school.

That said, I am considering a retake, but uncertain. For context, my dream school has a median LSAT of 171, and to attend, I would need to be able to receive at least a half tuition scholarship, otherwise I will not be able to afford it. On numbers alone (hoping that the other parts of my app are at least decent), I feel there's a decent chance I could get in, just not sure about scholarship. I plan to apply for outside scholarship opportunities as well. There are other schools I would be happy to attend, but the above mentioned school is my dream.

I am above their 75th percentile for GPA, which I think should be helpful. I also have a few years of law-adjacent experience.

Here's my pros/cons list:

Pros: retake could potentially put me over their median. This would likely lead to an increase in scholarship money.

Cons: if I don't do better, taking it again would feel like a waste of the limited financial resources I have and would potentially make my first score look like a fluke.

I have PT-ed above 170 a few times. If I can get mid 170s consistently, I may lean towards a retake more heavily. My only opportunity for a retake will be August, as I will be out of state for most of Sept/Oct/Nov. Also, January, but I would like to have applied by then.

What do you all think? I'm just at a bit of a loss here.

Hey guys, I am back studying and would like a study buddy or maybe a group but I want someone who I can study with in person in Philadelphia, PA. I do work in the am so it would be afternoon. I am in north philly but I can drive to meet in other parts of philly or if your around me we can meet up here. Im planning to take it in August :)

Hello! I'm a top-rated tutor on WyzAnt (profile "Shane G.") and am just getting set up as an independent tutor on 7Sage - after having made 7Sage my top recommendation as a 1-on-1 or group session supplement for the past 6 years at least.

I'm planning to start a free 1.5 hr weekly LR-focused session, at a time convenient for both myself and those attending, which will largely take on a Q&A style. However, if I notice a pattern/trend in the questions asked, then the remainder of the session may stay devoted to that area (e.g., NA v. SA, conditional logic, etc.).

Positive by-products of the free weekly session for those attending may include finding others with whom to form their own study group (especially if student attendance ranges from 3 to 9 attendees), learning new ways to drill target areas (a strategy I highly recommend), and finding connections between LR question types based on the questions we cover together (7Sage's logic concept tags are great for this).

Please join the group if you're interested! We can then figure out how to best schedule the free weekly session.

Hello everyone! I just want to say how I'm pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoy live sessions. I used to think they sound too complicated to integrate into my schedule, but after trying them out today, they're actually very enjoyable, and knowing that there are real people on the other end of the screen makes the studying experience a lot less isolating. Looking forward to more classes (and the selection is also amazing)!

Hey all,

I'm in south Florida, starting to study for the LSAT with hopes to take in October, anybody down to study together? Preference on local people. Thanks!

Hello,

About 25 days into studying for the September + October LSAT. 60% through the foundations course, I genuinely feel like I am understanding most of the concepts (Lawgic the most challenging for me). I find I get a bunch of questions wrong in the drills because I don't read carefully enough and I am trying to move quickly. I don't know if it's my own impatience and limited time to study, but I want to make sure this doesn't continue on to when I am testing. Does anyone have tips for how to read more carefully while still answering the questions quick enough? It just scares me that going slow I will never be able to speed back up quickly enough to answer all the questions in a set in time.

Hi everyone, Im Sharelle from Buffalo, NY. I'll be taking my LSAT in October with the anticipation of starting Law School by Spring of 27, if there are any one in the Buffalo area who is currently studying for their LSAT who has a study group I would love to join or if you're in the Buffalo area and would like to start a study group I would love for us to all connect.

Hello - I'm Grant and I am looking to offer some free help.

I am still amidst my study journey, but I thought it would be a good idea to get a new perspective on the LSAT by trying to teach those newer to the test, or those who are scoring in the 130/140's and would like to improve. Could be a win - win scenario.

I scored a 161 on the April administration, but I have many PT's between 163-170. I have been on my journey since last July, so I do believe I have some valuable insight regarding this test.

I am just looking to hop on a call for an hour or so once a week to work through some problems and possibly help to offer a new perspective.

Disclaimer - I am not claiming to be a tutor by any means, I am not asking for payment, I am just trying something new for myself that could benefit someone else as well :)

I feel so frustrated at the blind review feature. When I was first starting, I didn't realize that blind review shows you questions regardless of whether they were right or wrong. I then adjusted it in my preferences. However, I didn't realize that when it says "Flagged" for "Questions that you left flagged at the end of your practice," that it would bring me to my flagged questions with the exact same format as if it was incorrect. I thought it would just keep my flags on the question. Now I just did another blind review session where I changed the answers for the questions I answered correctly the first time, because I assumed they were wrong. This is so frustrating and I wish it was clearer on the UX why it was being suggested for blind review. Now that practice section won't be included in my analytics.. :(

Hey there! Seeking people in Miami to study with. I'm specifially located in the Coral Gables area. If there is interest, I'll start a discord group, where we can schedule meet up times to keep ourselves on track and motivated. Let me know below :)

Hello everyone!

I am taking the October 2026 LSAT and I would like to get a local study group going. I am willing to meet in person or online, whatever works best for anyone who decides to join!

Hi,

Below is every practice test I took up until my real test in april.

I took every test there is on 7sage that isn't an older test. What is your recommendation? Is it ok for me to re-practice tests in addition to drilling? Is there anyway to get new tests on 7sage? Do I really have to resort to taking older tests not in the LSAT computer format? I really need to start studying to be prepared for June. I really really want to beat my old score. Speaking of old score, what should I do if my 2nd test is lower? Cancel it or...? IF it depends on the score how long until a cancel is worth it? My target score is 166.

As the title states, I want to change my study plan to focus more on RC instead of LR

I just scored a 162 on PT153.

I'm currently going into my 4th year undergrad and I'm taking the LSAT this June. I just started reaching out to professors to get a confirmation that one is willing to write a letter of recommendation for my law school applications, but it is very difficult since my major is huge and all of the lectures have 200+ people. My grades are all in the A and A+ ranges. One of the professors I reached out to replied to me and said that she cannot write it since she does not know me first-hand, but she is okay with me reaching out to my TA to write about me, and then she will sign off on it but still explicitly state that she does not know me. In my opinion, I don't think that will be very helpful, but she says that method has been successfully used by other students in my position. I'm honestly just a little stressed and nervous and not sure what to do here. I'm still waiting for 2 other professors to reply to my emails. I honestly just need one academic letter since I plan on getting one from my boss at work. I'm applying to Ontario law schools only.

There are so many aspects of the new format that do not make any sense. First off, on RC you have far more scrolling to do. Everything is squished. The only solution is to make the words microscopic...

Second, the toggling to hide answers does not make any sense. Who thought that was a good UI change?

I saw one guy recommending making the background purple just to see everything better? I mean my word... what have we come to

Third, I dont even know... im just ranting at this point.

Hi everyone,

I am having trouble understanding causal reasoning. Would anyone be able to explain how it works and how I should approach a stimulus when the question type involves causal reasoning?

Also, I was wondering whether 7Sage has a section where we can review causal reasoning.