Hello! I am taking the LSAT in February, and I am also taking the LSAT in April.

I would like to have a tutor to help me study, review practice tests, and provide test tips.

If you are available to tutor me, please let me know asap!

I just took PREP Test 140. Scoring roughly -7 on the LR and -8 on the RC. What should I do now? Do I just start the core curriculum? Do I do drills? Any help would be greatly appreciated. I also plan to take it in April!

I have completed all the RC practice sections from test 120 and on. Are the previous tests similar to the current RC LSAT sections? Any suggestions for the best RC practice going forward are greatly appreciated.

Hi I recently took a drill and during review in one of the explanations I saw a live video where a student was taking a full PT. I though it was super helpful.

Are there any more of these videos on 7sage?

Hi, all! Is anyone in Northern California (or just the Pacific Time Zone) down to be accountability partners? Or to form a virtual group via Zoom? Don’t know about you, but I work best when I know there are other people expecting me to produce some results. :D

Hello! I am in need of a study buddy (would even organize an in-person study group if there's enough people!) around Atlanta, GA. Was thinking meetings could be 2-3x a month. Please let me know if interested!

Hi everyone,

Have you noticed if the RC passage times have some trend of number of question / passage time. There's usually 27 and maybe comp. is usually around 5 and law is 6 with science and huminites having the most? I'm just spitballing here. Anyone have any idea/ noticed any trends of what to expect?

Thanks

I dont know if its just me or anybody else, but is anyone else having issues with the format when you highlight something, on drills. The format seems to like move around, its hard to explain lol. It is bothering me so much.

I think this was mentioned sometime it passed, but I think a feature where we can postpone a blind review for a recently finished RC section for a later time would be very helpful, especially for people who feel burnt out after completing a PT. If this feature already exist, sorry for the inconvenience.

is it just me that does so well on drills but sees very little improvements on practice lsats?

almost on every drill that i do, i only get 1-2 wrong, or even get everything right, but when i take a practice lsat, i miss a lot more. i'm just wondering if anyone else is having the same problems, and what you did to improve.

hi hi! i'm studying for the april lsat and would love an accountability buddy to study with. i'm planning to study every day from 7-9 am EST and would love to work alongside someone during those early mornings. i'm more of an individual learner so this would just basically be us hopping on zoom calls tgtr and working on our own, but checking in with our goals and progress intermittently. thus, i'm happy to work with anyone in any score range, but i'm personally working towards a 170+. lmk if anyone is interested and thanks so much :)

Hi everyone,

I'm aiming for a 170 score and finding that my RC score will fluctuate from -0 to -4 / section and I'm trying to get that down/ or at least to something that is consistent

I'm wondering if anyone has had success in changing up the order of how they approach which passage first, second, third, fourth in RC

In LR the questions are automatically easy - hard (besides 18-25 which I usually do backwards once i hit 19)

For RC I've been doing humanities first, then law, then science, and then comparative - I can usually get all comparative right even if I only have 4-5 minutes, so I save it for last bc I know I can rush through it and still be able to guess right

What I've noticed though is I am scoring -2 or -3 on humanities passages even though I do in fact find those easier than law and science. I'm guessing that the reason is because I'm starting with it and I always do better as I go/ get into the zone/ and having easy --> hard in LR helps keep down the curve of error for me there (best LR section score so far: -1!!)

I'm wondering if people would suggest that I start with comparative and then humanities, then law then science? The problem is that I tried that yesterday and wound up not having enough time w science (prob bc I spent almost 7 minutes on comparative which is more than I usually give it -- and I needed those two minutes for science). I did get all the humanities right by doing it second (my order was: comp, humanities, law, science) but I feel like I sacrificed science points to get more humanities points.

I do think that having some strategy about the order in which I do passages could help and I'm curious if anyone has had similar thoughts/ experience could advise how it might be smarted to play around with this?

Thank you! Good luck studying!

I have been studying for months for the LSAT and took it in November, where I got a 143. Did not want to keep a score that low, so I am taking it again in January. I have been working with a tutor to help since November, and took a practice test today where I scored a 135. I don't know what I'm doing wrong or how I'm not improving

Hello everyone!

I'm taking my first LSAT Jan 10th and have been studying for months, but I can't get a grasp on timing.

When I PT without time, I average a very high score compared to when I PT with time.

I have always had test anxiety, which has gone away with being in uni. Unfortunately, with the LSAT, it seems to have come back.

My mind does not let me truly understand and read even the simplest of phrases, which has me get easy questions wrong, and run out of time on my RC.

Not sure what to do... has anyone had this issue, and what did you do??

Thanks!

Hi! Im currently trying to study for the LSAT and am thinking that having people (or even one person) would help for quicker learning and keeping ourselves honest. I really don’t care about PT, or what level, anyone is welcome! I was hoping for in person studying though so Long Beach Area would be great!

hi! please see question above? ive been doing slow work-throughs of LR sections, reviewing the questions I get wrong thoroughly (or what i think is thorough--identifying why wrong ACs are wrong, why the rigjt one is right). ive started to incorporate time, yet i am still in the same place of usually getting -3 to -4 wrong. i know it doesnt feel drastically different, yet i have been at this plateau for the past 3/4 months. I don't want to believe that I can't get better!! is there something I'm missing?

i've done some drills based on identified weaknesses (strengthen/weaken/NA). but i don't feel as though there are types that I can identify as consistently missed.

Looking for others to study with virtually (weekday nights around 7/8pm est) or in person (weekends, western Massachusetts). I've been studying for a few months now and am scoring in the high 150s on PTs. Aiming to take the LSAT for the first time in April. Would be nice to have others to hold me accountable for study time, think through missed/difficult questions with, and just talk general lsat/law school application stuff.

I would appreciate being able to filter my notes by all the Necessary Assumption questions or Conditional reasoning questions.

This would make reviewing and preparing for tests and practice much easier instead of scrolling thru.

Hey everyone! I am 24 years old (turning 25 soon), I am currently doing my masters, but LAW SCHOOL is my passion. I am supposed to write the exam in less than two weeks, but I am not prepared. I was so consumed with school and life, I don't think I am prepared. The last couple of years have been rough, with a lot of roadblocks in my path, which is why I have taken my sweet time to apply for law school.

I wanted to apply for the 2026 cycle, but I fear a bad score may look bad (especially since I have written the exam before). I want this really bad, but I fear I am getting old, and people my age are moving on, doing other things with their lives. I feel super behind. I know this sounds contradicatory, you want something really bad, but compare yourself with others.

The cultural background I come from, people usually don't take all the risks I have taken (as a woman). I was working for two years after my undergrad, went back for a masters and now applying for law school.

I don't know a part of me thinks I shouldn't write the exam, and study and apply for the 2027 cycle? Any thoughts, anyone on the same boat?

I’ve been tutoring the LSAT for about 5 years and will have a few openings after the January exam. I’m looking to take on a small number of motivated students for the next few months who are seeking sustainable score gains. I am passionate about teaching this test and helping students achieve their goals.

I scored a 180 and studied while working 20+ hours a week and attending a competitive undergrad, so I’m very familiar with balancing LSAT prep with a busy schedule. Because of that, I keep my rates affordable and focus heavily on efficient, structured studying rather than busywork. I spend a lot of my personal time outside of sessions helping my students, answering questions. This test opened many doors for me so I value its importance and being able to push my students properly toward their goals and hold them accountable during the week with the work I assign.

Rates (new students):

Free 20-minute strategy session

• $75/hr single session

• 5 hours – $350 ($70/hr)

• 10 hours – $650 ($65/hr)

• 15 hours – $900 ($60/hr)

• 20 hours – $1000 ($50/hr)

My approach is hands-on: we review PTs together, break down hard question types, clean up bad habits, and I give feedback/check-ins during the week so progress continues between sessions.

If you’re aiming for more consistency, higher scores, or want structured guidance heading into spring tests, feel free to reach out, very happy to chat or help.

Email- 180lsatteacher@gmail.com

SCORE BELOW

Hi! I have been studying for a few months now and plan on taking the LSAT in June and August. I am looking to study as much as possible and think it would be helpful to have a study group in the area! Looking for others to join that also want to put in as much time as possible

For sufficient assumption questions I am a bit confused of whether or not we are allowed to use the contrapositives of the argument for the answer. For example if we have

A

B

the link we need to make is A->B but if one of the answers are /B->/A would that be the right answer choice?

Hey i've been studying for the test for the year and a half with raging add. I raised my score by 4 points but am looking for someone to help raise it more and make it fun. I also study better with someone it helps me stay accountable and focus. I'm taking my test on January 8th as well as again in April. Please let me know if interested.

I'm currently running into an issue where, during blind review, my test-taking interface will begin timing out when I switch between questions. The problem persists after clearing my browser cookies, restarting my computer, and trying to use 7sage on different computers; I've also seen other users post about the same glitch. The interface also has generally been quite slow/irresponsive during blind review as well. I'd appreciate any help with this, since it makes the test taking interface functionally unusable. Thanks!

I've enjoyed the ability for 7sage to put together a study plan that utilizes the data I've fed it to cater to what it thinks I should focus on. However, one of my biggest gripes is the inability to open a suggested item into a new tab which then requires me to make my way back to the study plan after the completion of each suggested task. It's a small bit of friction but also one I feel like shouldn't be necessary.

It would also be nice if it remembered which blocks I've minimized but that's secondary to just wanting to open a task in a new tab so that I don't have to make my way back to the study plan each time.