I noticed that, despite not really doing any drills, sections, or PT's since after the November LSAT, some of my priorities have gone from high to medium, or medium to low. Is there any reason for this?

Now it's easier to pick up where you left off with the study plan's "Scroll to last viewed" button:

Also check out the "Recent activity" widget.

Happy studying!

I previously had most of my LR priority drills flagged as "highest priority". Been weeding out my problem areas one by one, started with Inference/MBT because its my weakest drill and I have the lowest accuracy. Suddenly, my stats changed...most of my drills have now dropped to low priority. Is this a sign of improvement? Or is there a glitch. I still have some high/highest priority topics.

Hey everyone,

Looking for some guidance on where to go from here.

I took my diagnostic a little while back and just sat for my first real PrepTest since studying. I ended up with a 175 timed and a 180 on Blind Review. Definitely happy with the result, but it’s also left me wondering what the smartest path forward is.

A few details/context:

I’ve been studying pretty deliberately for the past few weeks (really just going through the core curriculum)

Timing felt mostly fine on the test, but I could tell I was flirting with the edge on a couple of LR questions at the end (which showed in my section 1 results).

RC was solid but not effortless, I know I can get faster and more consistent.

I’m planning to take the actual LSAT within the next year and want to lock in a high-170s score reliably.

My main questions:

If I’m already testing in the mid-170s, how should I structure my study going forward?

Should I slow down PT frequency and focus more on targeted drilling?

How do I avoid plateauing or getting too comfortable too early?

Is there value in redoing old sections when I’m already at -0 BR?

Any advice on making sure this wasn’t a fluke?

In taking practice tests, I run out of time on RC. I don’t feel like I’m reading slow but the combination of reading then answering questions is killing me. Anyone have any suggestions? I would be scoring around 160 if I wasn’t running out of time and guessing….

Thank you in advance!

Can someone please explain why A is correct? Here was my initial breakdown/reasoning for why I thought E was the right point of issue:

Stim: There were some footprints found.

Dr. T: These are obviously hominid footprints because they have some human characteristics.

Dr. R: No Dr. T, these are not obviously hominid footprints because if you're right, then these hominids would've walked in a really weird way that's unlikely

ACs:

A: Originally got rid of A because it seemed like they both acknowledged the significance of the evidence, just that they interpreted the "squarish heel and a big toe etc" evidence differently in terms of what it meant

B: Neither of them really touch on this - seems like they both agree this set of footprints is at least somewhat distinguishable

C: Gait? Isn't mentioned by either

D: Dr. R isn't saying that this isn't enough evidence to support T's conclusion, she's saying that the evidence doesn't support the conclusion

E: R mentions how weird it would be if the hominids walked "in an unexpected cross-stepping manner, by placing the left foot to the right of the right foot," which I assumed was just walking upright. Hence why I chose E

#help

How can I access the explanation videos for the practice tests?

Hi all,

I'm currently doing the drills for Logical Reasoning and am finding trouble locating the proper tag for the Role Questions (e.g., identify the role of sentence XY in the argument). There seems to be no specific tags for this type of question when creating the drill.

Is it possible there is another tag for the role questions?

Just as the title says,

Not sure if this is already a feature but if you have accommodations the target time for questions should reflect that

does anybody have a disc group going for seattle peeps :0 looking to take the exam sept 2026, been studying here and there but trying to lock in for the next two months for suree

Hello friends!

Since joining the 7sage community a short while ago, I have been seeing the power score books mentioned a lot.

Are they necessary? Will I be at a disadvantage if I don't use them?

This is not my first time studying for the lsat. I have used other prep courses before and have also self studied with the LSAT trainer (which i loved). So, I'm just curious because since I have the ultimate+, I already have access to all lsat questions so I'm afraid to bother investing in the powerscore books if i don't really need them.

Hello 7Sage,

I enjoy the beta version of the study plan tool. Is there a way to have the study plan captured in the navigation path where you can easily click back to the study plan module you are on?

Ex: When I am in foundations (not in the study plan), I will click on the task and complete it. I can drive my cursor to the path and click on it and it will pick right back up where I left off.

If I do this through the study plan, the path directs to the core lessons sub-page and I can easily lose my place in the study plan because of this.

I essentially have to click on study plan at the top navigation panel and scroll down to where I last was in my study plan.

I hope this was descript enough for the team to understand.

Hello! I recently purchased both an LSAC LawHub Advantage subscription and a 7Sage subscription. while my accounts were registered as linked, 7Sage is not recognizing my purchase of the LSAC subscription. i have received a receipt for both subscriptions as well.

Hi! I was wondering if 7sage was planning on adding, or if anyone knew other sources for, explanations for the older PTs that are suggested at the bottom, such as A, B, etc?

Further open to any thoughts and advice/suggestions for good study material for anyone else who has used the traditional PTs already (has everything at close to or at 0% fresh).

Thanks!

Hi there,

My name is Carl, and I've been tutoring the LSAT since the early 2000s, online and in person. These days I mostly work online over Zoom.

I would never tell someone that it's impossible to self-study for the test or that a tutor is absolutely required, by any means. I would say, however, that having the right guidance at the right moment in your studies can both save you a lot of frustration and streamline the process of improving your score. I can guide you from the beginning of your studies or step in as a troubleshooter when you hit a sticking point. I can take a look at the work you've done recently and try to diagnose what's holding you back and provide you with a recommendation of the best next steps to take in the short term and in the long term.

Two people scoring in the 170s might tackle the test in completely different ways. My job as a tutor is not to turn you into a carbon copy of me, but to help you find the combination of techniques and methods that will get you the score you want. Sure, there are certainly some required skills on the test--some questions are impossible, for example, if you don't know what a contrapositive is. But there's also a lot of leeway. There's no one-size-fits-all approach, and I tailor my lessons to you and your needs.

I specialize in helping people move the needle who've been stuck on a plateau for a long time. I also offer a free one-hour evaluation session to all potential clients, an hour for us to meet, discuss your troubles, have me demonstrate my tutoring style, and have you ask any questions you have. So, please, reach out if you'd like to schedule an evaluation with me to see if I can help you.

So what has helped everyone determine if something is an argument or not an argument in LR questions?

Hello,

Ive been really struggling with the main point or main idea questions in RC, I consistently get the first question wrong and I was wondering if anyone had any insights or tips on how to overcome this. Thank you! :)

Hi everyone, I need a push of encouragement. I attended a calbar school fall of 2023 and was academically dismissed. I took some time off then realized at some point this year I do want to return to a new law school in fall of 2026. I began studying for the LSAT again in July of this year. I feel that I am regressing in my studying simply because I am feeling discouraged. My PT scores have steadily dropped and so has my confidence. I am feeling that all of my effort will not result in a positive result for me. I am scheduled to take the November LSAT this week, at this point I do not want to withdraw as I feel that I will regret not taking it. This will be my third attempt with my first 2 terrible attempts being in 2022.

This last few weeks my constant failure on PT's and drills has me feeling that I am indeed NOT cut out for law school nor to be an attorney. If anyone is/has been in the same boat would love to hear your thoughts/journey.

Going to make a November LSAT chat here on 7Sage, comment if you'd like me to add you!

Hey 7Sagers, we're looking for a new designer who understands the LSAT—maybe you! Full post below. Put questions in the comments. Thanks!

Location: fully remote

Hours: 20–30 hours per week with potential for full-time

Compensation: $50 to $150 per hour, based on experience

About the Role

We’re seeking a UI and UX designer to help us develop new features and flows for our LSAT Prep platform.  The work may involve iterating on current designs, taking a wireframe to high fidelity, or starting with a problem statement and delivering a complete solution.

You’ll be expected to

• Learn about the LSAT study process so you have sufficient context

• Explore the website so that you can plug your designs into the rest of the app’s functionality

• Distill complicated problems into simple abstractions

• Think on the level of both the big-picture UX and the nitty-gritty details of the UI

• Communicate clearly and concisely

• Deliver developer-friendly, well-documented Figma files that utilize auto-layouts and reusable components where appropriate.

About our workflow

You’ll do most of your work independently with regular consultations from the heads of product and design along with feedback from other stakeholders. We group our projects into epics, but we don’t do scrums or formal sprints. Much of our communication happens via screencast videos and chat, but you must be available for occasional remote meetings.

We are allergic to slides or anything that feels too ceremonious.

We value clarity, usability, and simplicity above pure aesthetics, and when given the choice, we’ll always pick a solution that gets us 80% of what we want at 20% of the effort.

About the process

Apply using this form.

Begin your cover with the phrase "Why I'm a good fit—".

If we’d like to move forward, we’ll schedule a screening interview and then ask you to do a paid trial project.

I would love the ability to change what is automatically generated in practice blocks. I like the general guidelines and structure it creates but I'd like the ability to move stuff around and be able to "complete" a practice block and have it shown as complete for a week without necessarily doing a PT every single week like it has been suggesting for me. I'm also trying to focus more on RC, so I'd like to be able to add more practices into my RC days and have it show up in my X min left section for the tracker.

how do y'all use your analytics? I feel like there's so much data there that I'm not taking advantage of.

does the study plan basically do that for you? or should I be building in extra drills to specifically target my weaknesses?

are there any hidden details that you've found helpful?

should I be worried that my drilling accuracy hasn't budged (even though my pt scores have been going up)? or does that just mean the ~algorithm~ is assigning me harder drills?

grateful for any wisdom you guys share!

I'm looking for some people to start a LSAT study group for in person or online a few times a week.

I will be making a groupchat so let me know if you're interested!

Hello is anyone currently studying for the LSAT in this area and would want to study together?

Hi everyone, I’d really appreciate some advice. I’m an international student, and I’ve been studying for the LSAT on and off for about two months. My diagnostic score was a 144. Since I haven’t been fully committed to studying yet, my score is still in the 140s, but my goal is to reach 170+ so that I can apply for Fall 2027.

My original plan was to study full-time until January. However, I recently received a full-time job offer from a friend, and I’m not sure whether I should accept it. The job is directly related to the human rights field I want to pursue in law school, so it would allow me to gain meaningful experience. But I’m worried that working full-time would interfere with my LSAT preparation and delay my timeline.

I’m really torn between the two options, and I would be grateful to hear your thoughts. Thank you!