For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... questions if I had a bank of time left, etc. I ... a slight dash under a question to review under BR b ... revisit the explanation, circle the Question number that I am about ... entire thought process for every question that I was confident but ...
Im confused about these webinars. First off, what are they? Are they live? I know theres one coming up this wed at 9, how do I access it? How do I access past ones?
... and I have a quick question. Anyone from the admin staff ... . Now, I will only have access to PTs up to PT ... during my 16 months of access. So will these new PTs ... to PTs I will have access to as they come along ...
... other 7sagers on tackling Flaw question types.
I have gone ... improve with these question types. Ive noticed these question types appear quite ...
... to explanation for ease of access: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat ... really difficult time understanding this question. How can 4 of the ... don't understand what this question is asking for at ... couldn't comprehend what the question is asking for.
...