Flaw questions require you to ... argument but CANNOT identify the flaw. That is your red flag ... of trying to identify the flaw before you tackle the ... do) and cannot identify the flaw their chances of getting the ...
... . After that I find the flaw and ask "What if...?" then ... />
Weaken / strengthen: no strategy! Flaw: JY's 2 part test ... words
Pfmor: see the flaw and get a strong understanding ...
Can we think that "confusing a possible solution as the only solution" to be similar to "confusing the sufficient for necessary", or is there another nuanced difference between the two that I'm not quite catching onto?
The answer here was D. However, I thought D here was wrong because the stimulus never explicitly mentioned anything about "total" emissions-- it just said that the cars spend more time spewing emissions. Can anyone explain to me why D ...
In questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I find myself spending way too much time trying to decipher if the stimulus is mistaking sufficiency for ...
#help
Whenever we are given [P→C] argument. I tend to see [C→P] as a correct strenthening answer choice. I understand that such answer choices try to a create connection between P and C, but isn’t this a negation flaw?