... said:
> S2 LR 17/25
> S3 LG ... 18/23
> S4 RC 12/27 (dang. i ... the section where blind reviewing PT's helped most clearly. I ... clip them out of your PT's too.
... to my satisfaction alongside regular PT's. And they were not ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
I took PT 46 yesterday after upgrading my ... LG, and -1 RC. On PT 50 I got annihilated on ... , -1 RC from -14 LR..). PT 51 was "in between" 50 ... LR than I did on PT 50 but not as well ... as I did on PT 46 (-6 LR).
... .
I'll have a PT where I bomb reading comp ...
I'll have a pt where I bomb an LR ... />
Almost all of my PT's lately have been like ... , I cannot put a full PT together. I'll do good ... from section to section per PT to PT. anyone else having this ...
... score around an 18 and 17 on both LRs. I found ... -162 and on my last PT I got a 166, and ... (far from it) I usually PT in the lower 160s (RC ...
... and took my first timed PT last week ago. I blind ... reviewed this PT as well. The timed and ... I tried to take another PT (62) but in the middle ... . I also decided to scrap PT 62 entirely since I was ...