I wanted to check my understanding on this question vis. all of yours. I got this question wrong, however, in my blind review, I noted a necessary assumption and wanted to see ...
I simply had no clue for this one. And the correct AC seems to be making a huge assumption so I didn't choose it. Can we really reasonably infer that thieves who do not ...
For anyone who had LR (25), RC (27), LR (26), LR (26), LG (23), do you know which LR sections were real? TLS says the two real sections featured an Irish mace and a parrot. I remember those questions, but I don't remember where they were in my setup.
I was stuck between B and E because I thought both could be right answers. So I finally chose E because of the word "net effect". But the answer is B.
The more I looked into, the more I had no idea why E was wrong.
Can anyone explain me why B ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-02/
I was stuck between B and C (I thought both could be answers) and finally chose C. But the answer is B. The more I looked into, the more I had no idea why C was wrong.
Can ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-4-question-26/
I don't understand how to get the answer to Question 26 in Part 4 of Prep Test 70 (October 2013).
It talks about a historical fact, but I'm unsure where they get this ...
... first diagnostic I got 11/23 on the logic games.. So ... , or 20s out of 23. Once I got 23/23. But now, it ... 'll either get a 21/23 or I will completely bomb ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-4-question-24/
Can someone please explain this? I got the right answer but I can't justify my reasoning
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-20/
I am all sorts of confused by this reconcile/resolve question! In general, I'm not great at these questions, but I think they're pretty fun to do so I don't mind working on them. So ...
Can y'all please help me explain this? I watched the video a few times, but the numbers method that JY explained..is just not really iron clad proof for me, or at least I'm not really understanding it.