I have done 10 PTs (I am very early in the PT process), but I would like to know at what point in your studies did you start consistently hitting your target raw score when you took PTs. I'd just like an average frame of reference for my studies.
When we say that X is ... Y, would that create a biconditional? For example, if I look ... this relationship always create a biconditional? Just curious.
Having some trouble identifying when I should move on from a question. My current pace is not getting to around 2 problems per section. I am looking to hear what you guys/gals do so I can get some ideas.
I'm confused to when to diagram. some inference Q are obvious with logical indicators. Some are hidden or have causation in the argument and qualifiers (maybe, could etc). When do you diagram? what's the general rule?
When to ACTUALLY Diagram in LR ... with diagramming?
—When should I diagram? When shouldn’t I diagram ... />
—What is “hunt-mode” and when do I tap into it ... this webinar:
7sage Webinar: When to ACTUALLY Diagram in LR ...
What type of decrease, if any, do you all experience when taking too long of a break between timed, 5-section tests? What is recommended as an ideal schedule for PT taking?
For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?