Analogy (LR)

(An)

Stimuli that feature arguments by analogy, where the success or failure of that analogy informs the answer choices.

Avg. 1.35 per section
17%
26%
32%
14%
10%

Avg. difficulty: 2.7

Correct answer criteria

  • To support a judgment in one situation, the author presents information about another, distinct situation that is purportedly similar in all relevant respects

Key tactics

  • Arguments by analogy are common in every LR question type, in both sections of the LSAT, and also in the broader world of legal argument
  • Learn to recognize them by name when they appear, and ask whether the analogy is well crafted or vulnerable to criticism
  • The two things being compared in an analogy are always similar in some ways and different in others. What matters is if there are RELEVANT differences that affect the author's specific conclusion

Answer choice tips

  • In "Flaw" or "Method of reasoning" questions, correct answers will often use the words "analogy" or "analogous" directly
  • In other question types (WSE, NA, SA, etc.), information that bolsters or challenges the analogy is likely to appear in the correct answer choice
  • For example, if the author argues for a certain tax policy in one country because it was successful in another country, look for information about relevant economic differences between the two countries

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?