Describe approach

(Appr.)

Stems that ask us to characterize the approach the authors take in presenting their passages, often in abstract terms (e.g. "applying general principles to particular examples"). Exclusive to comparative reading passages.

Avg. 0.1 per section

“The argument described in passage A and the argument made by the author of passage B are both advanced by”

Method of reasoning or descriptive
11%
0%
33%
11%
44%

Avg. difficulty: 3.8

Correct answer criteria

  • Accurate description of the way the authors develop their arguments

Key tactics

  • Do you recall, or did you note, a common form of reasoning from the stimulus? (rule-application, phenomenon-hypothesis, generalization, analogy, cost/benefit, etc.)
  • If you can't, that's OK; not every argument uses an easy-to-describe form of reasoning

Answer choice tips

  • Be careful about answers that are extreme - wrong answers will often go beyond what the argument actually said (e.g., The second author said the first author's conclusion was "unjustified," but a wrong answer says the second author called the first author's conclusion "false.")
  • Be prepared for abstract answers - take time to match different parts of the correct answer to the stimulus. If you can't match every part of the answer to the stimulus, it's wrong

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?