Flaw or descriptive weakening

(Flaw)

Stems that ask us to articulate a flaw in the stimulus' argument, either in abstract terms or by pointing out a weakness.

Avg. 3.85 per section

“The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it”

12%
21%
35%
20%
13%

Avg. difficulty: 3.0

Correct answer criteria

  • Accurate description of why the argument's reasoning is flawed. The answer could be phrased in the following ways: 1. Abstract description of the bad reasoning 2. What the argument overlooks 3. What the argument assumes

Key tactics

  • Identify the conclusion and the premises
  • Think about why the conclusion doesn't have to be true even if the premises are true
  • Sometimes you'll be able to recognize a common form of flaw (confusing sufficient and necessary conditions, correlation to cause, etc.)

Answer choice tips

  • Be careful about answers that misdescribe the conclusion
  • Correct answers must (1) be descriptively accurate, and (2) constitute bad reasoning
  • Answers phrased in the form of what the argument overlooks can be analyzed just like Weaken answers. (So the tendencies that apply to Weaken answers apply to these answers, too!)
  • Answers phrased in the form of what the argument assumes can be analyzed just like Necessary Assumption answers. (So the tendencies that apply to Necessary Assumption answers apply to these answers, too!)

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?