Bad authority
(BadAuth)
Bad authority
(BadAuth)
Arguments that rely on an inappropriate authority to support their conclusions (e.g. conventional mathematics is fundamentally flawed because Terrence Howard says so).
Avg. 0.0 per section
Key tactics
- Just because someone says (or even a lot of people say) X, that doesn't mean X is true.
- This is brought to focus when that someone is opining on a subject where we have no reason to believe that they have special knowledge. E.g., asking the general public about the latest theories in quantum computing or asking a biologist about foreign policy.
Answer choice tips
- Example answer choices that point to this flaw:
- makes an illegitimate appeal to the authority of an expert
- appeals to the authoritativeness of an opinion without evaluating the merit of a putative counterexample
- infers a claim to be false merely because a majority of people believe it to be false
- provides no justification for giving preference to the views of one rather than the other of two competing sets of authorities.
Argument part
Evaluate
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Inference
Main conclusion or main point
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Resolve reconcile or explain
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Weaken
Analogy (RC)
Application
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Implied
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Other’s perspective
Principle or generalization
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)