Conditional reasoning

(CondR)

Stimuli that feature conditional and set logic (e.g. A → B, A is true, therefore B is true).

Avg. 4.5 per section
6%
15%
35%
29%
17%

Avg. difficulty: 3.4

Key tactics

  • The Conditional reasoning tag applies to any stimulus that features conditional claims (e.g. if ___, then ____), or claims about sets (e.g. all cats are mammals).
  • Flawed conditional reasoning is one of the most tested concepts on the LSAT, but many stimuli feature valid conditional reasoning patterns as well.
  • Fluency in formal logic diagramming (we call our language "Lawgic") is immensely helpful, both in the learning process and on the test itself.
  • Diagramming takes time to learn, and it's normal for it to feel slow or confusing at first. For most students, it's worth the investment because it builds a deeper understanding of conditional logic that pays off on test day.

Answer choice tips

  • THE important thing to note about conditional claims is not to confuse a sufficient condition for a necessary condition. For example, consider the claim "All my friends are nerds":
  • That claim does NOT mean "All nerds are my friends" nor does it mean "Anyone who is not my friend is not a nerd." Both of these claims confuse a sufficient condition for a necessary condition.
  • Wrong answer will often try to tempt you to confuse a sufficient condition for a necessary condition.

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?