Equivocation

(Equiv)

Arguments that use a single term to mean two substantially different things, resulting in misleading or invalid reasoning.

Avg. 0.05 per section
0%
15%
31%
23%
31%

Avg. difficulty: 3.7

Key tactics

  • Equivocation often reads like a pun. Like maybe a billboard says “Looking for a sign? This is it!” Get it? Because sign can mean omen but also the billboard is a literal sign! Get it?
  • Although it can be confusing at first, once you get accustomed to the patterns, equivocation on specific terms will jump out at you automatically.
  • Like the circular reasoning flaw, this flaw more often shows up as a wrong rather than a right answer. Hence, learning to recognize equivocation when it happens allows you to quickly say "No, no, I would have noticed if the argument did that" to answer choices.

Answer choice tips

  • Example answer choices that point to this flaw:
  • responds to a claim in which “available” is used in the sense of “affordable” by using “available” in the sense of “not occupied.”
  • improperly exploits an ambiguity in the phrase “public interest”
  • unreasonably extends the application of a key term.
  • ignores a difference in how the idea of forced work applies to the two cases.
  • fails to distinguish two distinct senses of a key term.

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?