Failed alternate explanation
(FAltExp)
Failed alternate explanation
(FAltExp)
Weaken Qs: Answers that try to introduce an alternate explanation, but fall short, or try to explain a different phenomenon.
Strengthen Qs: Answers that try to eliminate an alternate explanation, but fall short, or try to eliminate an explanation for a different phenomenon.
Avg. 0.0 per section
Key tactics
- One of the most common reasons supposed alternate explanations fail is by targeting the wrong phenomenon. For example, if the conclusion is that a fatty diet causes heart disease, a wrong answer might read "Japanese people, who eat disproportionately fatty diets, are more likely to recover from heart disease than people from other countries."
- The above answer choice starts out as though it will suggest something other than fat must be responsible for heart disease, but veers into irrelevance when it discusses recovery rates rather than disease rates.
Argument part
Evaluate
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Inference
Main conclusion or main point
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Resolve reconcile or explain
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Weaken
Analogy (RC)
Application
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Implied
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Other’s perspective
Principle or generalization
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)