Internal contradiction
(IntContra)
Internal contradiction
(IntContra)
Arguments that feature two or more statements that are logically inconsistent with one another (e.g. "bread is delicious" and "bread is not delicious"), or set forth a rule and then come to a judgment that contradicts the rule.
Avg. 0.1 per section
21%
43%
14%
21%
Avg. difficulty: 3.1
Key tactics
- Sometimes the author states or assumes both X and not X. That's an internal contradiction.
- Sometimes the author unwittingly undermines their own argument, bringing up evidence that actually suggests their conclusion should cut the other way.
Answer choice tips
- Example answer choices that point to this flaw:
- the results of the analysis are interpreted as indicating that the use of titanium as an ingredient in fifteenth-century ink both was, and was not, extremely restricted.
- draws a conclusion that cannot be true if all the data advanced in its support are true.
- makes incompatible assumptions.
- its conclusion contradicts an implicit principle on which an earlier part of the argument is based.
Argument part
Evaluate
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Inference
Main conclusion or main point
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Resolve reconcile or explain
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Weaken
Analogy (RC)
Application
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Implied
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Other’s perspective
Principle or generalization
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)