Link assumption

(LinkA)

Arguments that feature an unjustified shift from one concept to another, which don't fit neatly into other common flaw categories (e.g. moving from premises about "buildings" to a conclusion about "houses").

Avg. 3.15 per section
9%
20%
35%
24%
13%

Avg. difficulty: 3.1

Key tactics

  • A huge part of why the LSAT has a reputation as a persnickety, pedantic test is because it constantly asks us to notice tiny changes in wording that lead to substantive differences.
  • Most of the common flawed reasoning patterns can be described in Link assumption terms - jumping from correlation to causation, from sufficiency to necessity, from pecentages to amounts, etc.
  • "Link assumption" is the catch-all tag for conceptual jumps that don't fall into common categories (e.g. from "hiking" to "outdoor recreation").
  • Whenever an author uses two different phrasings to refer to (supposedly) the same concept, ask yourself whether those two concepts are ACTUALLY the same.
  • Sometimes the two concepts are the same. For example, "ways to hide" and "methods of concealment" are functionally the same despite their different wording.
  • Sometimes the two concepts are different. For example, "hiking" and "outdoor recreation" are different because hiking is a specific kind of outdoor recreation, and there are other kinds too (like playing tennis).

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?