Mental state v. reality
(MvR)
Mental state v. reality
(MvR)
Stimuli that feature a jump from a claim about a mental state to a claim about reality (or vice versa).
Avg. 0.35 per section
Key tactics
- The argument turns on the distinction between things that are true inside people's heads (mental state) and things that are true in the outside world (reality).
- Examples:
- Just because Shana believes the store opens at 9am doesn't mean that the store actually opens at 9am.
- We read in the stimulus that a recipe calls for 4tbsp of salt and we erroneously project that knowledge by assuming that a chef also knows that the recipe calls for 4tbsp of salt.
- Just because someone hits a bicyclist with a car doesn't mean that he did it intentionally.
Answer choice tips
- Example answer choices that point to this flaw:
- asserting something without justification is not the same as asserting something one knows to be false
- a claim is inferred to be false merely because a majority of people believe it to be false
- assumes that an action has an effect only if it was performed in order to bring about that effect.
Argument part
Evaluate
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Inference
Main conclusion or main point
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Resolve reconcile or explain
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Weaken
Analogy (RC)
Application
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Implied
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Other’s perspective
Principle or generalization
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)