Confusing sufficiency and necessity

(SuffvNec)

The "oldest mistake in the book." Arguments that confuse a sufficient condition for a necessary condition. For example, the claim A → B is confused for B → A or /A → /B.

Avg. 0.6 per section
3%
21%
36%
30%
10%

Avg. difficulty: 3.2

Key tactics

  • We call this flaw the "oldest mistake in the book" because you are guaranteed see this multiple times in every PrepTest.

Answer choice tips

  • Example answer choices that point to this flaw:
  • assumes without warrant that just because satisfying a given condition is enough to ensure an announcement’s importance, satisfying that condition is necessary for its importance.
  • (In response to a stimulus that presents a premise saying "A -> B" but concludes "B -> A"): ignores the possibility that B may sometimes happen while A does not happen.
  • mistakenly interprets P to be claiming that a factor assures, rather than is necessary for, a legislator’s effectiveness.

Looking for more?

7Sage offers a full course of video lessons that cover each question type in depth, targeted drills, and performance analytics.

Confirm action

Are you sure?