Comparative
(Co)
Comparative
(Co)
RC passages that are split into two mini-passages, with questions that ask us to compare or contrast them with one another.
Avg. 5.4 per section
Key tactics
- There are two distinct methods of attacking comparative passages:
- The split approach involves reading passage A first, solving any questions that ask only about that passage and eliminating any answers you can from questions that ask about both passages, only then returning to read passage B.
- The sequential approach more closely mirrors the normal method (reading both passages up front identifying different perspectives and key concepts), but with the additional goal of identifying points of contact between the two passages (i.e. disagreements, agreements, or subjects they approach from different angles).
- You should keep an open mind about which approach is best for you. Try each on several passages, timed and untimed, before deciding which you prefer.
Argument part
Evaluate
Fill in the blank
Flaw or descriptive weakening
Inference
Main conclusion or main point
Method of reasoning or descriptive
Most strongly supported
Must be false
Must be true
Necessary assumption
Parallel flawed method of reasoning
Parallel method of reasoning
Point at issue: agree
Point at issue: disagree
Principle
PSA - find or complete the application
PSA - find the rule
Resolve reconcile or explain
Strengthen
Sufficient assumption
Weaken
Analogy (RC)
Application
Author’s attitude
Author’s perspective
Describe approach
Describe organization
Describe relationship
Implied
Logical continuation
Main point
Meaning in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Other’s perspective
Principle or generalization
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Purpose of paragraph
Purpose of passage
Stated
Structure
WSE (RC)