It's a cruel world we live in

It does not deny the premise. The corporation owning a majority of the shares and refusing to sell does not necessitate that they are not going bankrupt. It's okay!!

Keep drilling and reviewing, it will click!

Usually, there's two sets of facts presented. They don't make sense together unless you draw an assumption, and there's one presented in the answer block that resolves, explains, or reconciles the information presented to you. Which answer makes it make sense? That's the right one.

What are you on about

This

i love cheese

FML

Agreed

The answer choices aren't bad -- they're meant to confuse you. That's the point of this test. Recall back to earlier lessons when we learn that there is only ever one right answer. This means that there is no world in which D could be right, provided the stimulus and question block.

Answer D calls back to the context of the stimulus, not the argument. That's why it's wrong. Answer C is the most strongly supported. That doesn't mean it's the best possible answer, just the best out of this question block.

For people like me who write down the "review" portion of every lesson, copy and paste the transcript of the lesson in ChatGPT and ask to format a review for information pertaining to MSS questions (or whatever is being covered) and not pertaining to the specific question itself.

Yes

W

look at my lawyer dawg i'm going to jailll

Most whales are mammals. (Remember that in quantifiers, most can imply all)

Most mammals live on land.

_

Some whales live on land.

Big jump

"Enough" and "needed" work better for me, I'm in the same boat.

This is pretty standard

Less big scholarship offers. That's about it. If you get into a high ranked school, leverage that on a lower rank for more offers if money is what you're concerned with. I'm in the same boat as you -- don't worry too much but stick to your schedule.

Yes- I made the same mistake. The start and end of the prompt are complications/modifiers. The comparative statement being made is just "comfort vs uncomfort" if that makes sense. In this statement, uncomfort/ "now" (as he puts it) wins.

Reading comprehension portions with questions like "what is the primary theme of the text" and they swap the comparisons in a subtle manor to try and trip you up. That's just one of the scenarios.

Eh, I think this is more for sheer comprehension of dense text in the LSAT RC portion. Yes, it does make for a weaker argument when stripped down, but you're getting the gist of something wordy and pedantic without wasting much time.

Yes

Philosophy preps you well for this stuff though.

I did all my reading before 7sage. The book they recommended is good but I'd also recommend a book on deductive and inductive formal logic.