im cooked

missing questions because u have a limited vocabulary and dont know the word cogent. slay the house down boots

my set had two L5 questions and two L4 questions. demonic af anyway i still got 5/5 it's giving harvard law some would say

these r cooking me more than SA. i didnt think it was possible

assumptions so necessary i don't even notice i'm assuming them and end up missing the question fmllll

i thought i was actually making progress after getting the last L5 but nvm. joining that one mf on the freeway

I LOVE U LEVEL 5 I GOT IT. i do wish we had a few more L5 and L4 questions mixed in among the lessons!

i looked at the question before watching the video and picked A but switched to E because i misread it as "the intentions of the FOUNDERS should not determine what is collected" and didnt understand why it wasnt that one until watching the whole video. love misreading and making simple mistakes

this L5 cooked me extremely i fear

@yesterdayseeker ok this was super helpful because i was still stuck on the conclusion

was this very easy? yes. but did i get it right 30 seconds faster than recommended? also yes.

knew i shoulda diagrammed this bih

10 seconds over sigh

really would love if there were the option to solve the question on our own before the video walkthrough! very helpful but would appreciate the option

got it right but was going back and forth between B and C for a while. i'm scared about the test since i've been taking over time on a lot of qs but hopefully that will reduce as i keep studying over the next few months

got it right & picked the correct answer first but went back and forth between A and E for a minute over time

5/5 first try:D my timing is all over the place tho. hope speeding up comes naturally as i keep practicing

5/5 LFG!!!!!!! who woulda thought prepping for the lsat of all things would cause my dopamine levels to spike

3/3 all under target time let's gooo

got it right with 41 seconds left over:D

i stared at 1 for 20 minutes and still got it wrong

one fun way i've been remembering sufficient v necessary is: if i am dating x person --> they meet my bare minimum

the one thing that i got tripped up on is--is it not possible for the coffee shoppe to start selling non-coffee products and also avoid a decrease in coffee sales? maybe overthinking, but couldn't this avoid a decrease in overall profitability as well?

the day i don't confuse sufficient and necessary information is the day the world ends

imagining two rival shrimp gangs